eicker@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoMac Users Are Nuking Every Trace of Apple AI on Their Machines: Sayonara useless AI features, and hello disk space.futurism.comexternal-linkmessage-square63linkfedilinkarrow-up1528arrow-down130
arrow-up1498arrow-down1external-linkMac Users Are Nuking Every Trace of Apple AI on Their Machines: Sayonara useless AI features, and hello disk space.futurism.comeicker@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square63linkfedilink
minus-squareyestalgia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·3 days agoI think you mean Tim Apple
minus-squaref314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·3 days agoIt’s John Apple now! (Tim Cook resigned. John Ternus is the current CEO of Apple)
minus-squarequantumcrop@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoI like the idea of Apple’s leadership working on a princess bride model. Tim Apple is simply a title that gets handed down
minus-squareBryllyg@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 days agoWhat if it’s a Dread Pirate Roberts situation, and every subsequent Apple CEO automatically becomes “Tim Apple”?
minus-squareCocodapuf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoThen they should definitely all be Steve Apple.
minus-squareGreyEyedGhost@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoNo, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don’t really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person.
minus-squarereddig33@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoTim didn’t really resign/retire. They promoted him to Chairman. https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/10/11/tim-cook-visits-china-for-the-third-time-in-2026
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days agoAh woops you beat me to it!
I think you mean Tim Apple
It’s John Apple now!
(Tim Cook resigned. John Ternus is the current CEO of Apple)
I like the idea of Apple’s leadership working on a princess bride model. Tim Apple is simply a title that gets handed down
What if it’s a Dread Pirate Roberts situation, and every subsequent Apple CEO automatically becomes “Tim Apple”?
Then they should definitely all be Steve Apple.
No, for two reasons. First, there are already two Steve Apples, from the same time, no less. Second, because we don’t really want one of those Steves back. Great marketer, shit person.
Tim didn’t really resign/retire. They promoted him to Chairman.
https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/10/11/tim-cook-visits-china-for-the-third-time-in-2026
Ah woops you beat me to it!