• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 小时前

      The thing is the boat was very clearly going down when they got on.

      Everyone knew it was a pyramid scheme from the start they just thought there were at the top of the pyramid and now they’re worried because it looks like they’re a little further down than that so they’re trying to minimize their losses.

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 小时前

    I’d love it if it was packaged up into securities and credit rating agencies gave those securities an A+++ would buy again rating so my wallstreet-managed 401k knows where to steal my money.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 小时前

    If theres one thing the US stock market has, its plenty of clueless bagholders with more money than common sense.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 小时前

    It’s about time for the ultra-wealthy to create another 2007 so they can wrench the last bits of wealth off anyone who isn’t already a $100Ms-billionaire.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 小时前

    Oh NO! We NEED to Raise Taxes to PAY for these things OTHERWISE who’s going to Take Our Jobs while Poisoning Our Water while Killing Our Children while making Subpar Fruit Videos?

    -US Politicians!

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 小时前

      Dont worry, they will wait for the current tranche of laws to pass cementing that we can never create taxes specifically on the wealthy in the future. Like Californias prop 42

      https://calmatters.org/politics/2026/10/newsom-tax-propositions-november-election/

      Wasington’s IP26-645. Iowa’s comnstitutional ammendment. North Carolinas “constitional taxpayer protections”. Missouri’s ammendment 5.

      Protecting the wealthys money is all the rage lately, a brand new booming legislative goldrush.

      Then they will let the AI bubble implode-- not before. We have a few months still. Live it up. Play the market like its still the gilded age.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 小时前

    It’s happening!!! Bubble pop is happening!!! article is underplaying it.

    Coreweave debt pushed towards 16% yield today. The worst of the AI clusterfuck. Oracle, 2nd worse, move to 8% which is still absurdly low, but was holding 6% a week ago.

    Main headline, yes the big banks are selling off debt to losertards. At a discount. Insurance companies are the losertards chasing yield, but have big losses today.

    Nvidia, the circular financing backstop for the bubble, signaled today that it is just waiting for bankruptcies to swoop in instead of propping up the fraud. Bond/share holders will get crushed, and bubble dead, but still Nvidia will drive rampocalypse if the datacenters are still alllowed.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 小时前

    I work in commercial real estate. This is a normal common practice in commercial real estate. They honestly do this for pretty much every type of real estate and for as many as they can.

    They securitize it in portfolios and sell off interest in those payments to others. They intentionally mix and match properties in portfolios so if one fails, there is less risk to the whole thing.

    I’ve seen fast food restaurants, malls, airports, billboards, cell towers, hollywood studios, aerospace firms, law firms, hotels, apartments, everything. And yes, also data centers

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 小时前

      They intentionally mix and match properties in portfolios so if one fails, there is less risk to the whole thing.

      If AI fails, that is 25% of the US GDP, isn’t it? How can you distribute risk for that?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 小时前

      Oh great that makes me feel much better now they’re going to take down the entire economy. Although to be honest the US economy was doomed anyway.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 小时前

        Well, Oracle will implode and Ellison will be broke. He and his idiot son will probably have to sell off all their media holdings. So, a small silver lining. You cant eat it, but …

  • Logi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 小时前

    That is on top of the $18 billion in bonds it sold in a single day last September

    That’s $6.57 trillion in annualized debt using AI bubble math.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 小时前

      I dont know that we can collectively understand a number that big and what it means to us. People barely comprehend what a billion is.

    • Atropos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 小时前

      The year my paycheck lands on Jan 1, my personal financial projections are gonna look SO AMAZING

      • crank0271@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 小时前

        Clearly you aren’t a megacorp. Just set your fiscal year to begin on the day of your paycheck. Checkmate, YNAB.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    edit-2
    14 小时前

    Probably related to the now three Oracle data center that can’t get electricity.

    Wisconsin passed a law that fast tracking large projects requires a high credit rating or collateral, to pay secure costs for building the power plants needed for the data center. In July Oracle’s debt rating was downgraded to near junk levels.

    That means Oracle can no longer get Wisconsin to supply power to the data center so it’s a $15 billion dollar paper weight. Thats putting even further downward pressure on their credit rating and ability to secure loans to meet their $500B in obligations.

    Now Oracle’s New Mexico data center is stuck due to contract issues with water and gas turbines, so they can’t move foreward. Oracle has a 9% interest rate on the loans to build that, then they raise 2% after construction, because their credit rating is dogshit. So now Oracle is claiming force majeur to get out of their increased debt obligations, which you can imagine, is killing interest in lending to them.

    In Texas they just blocked new grid hookups over political backlash to skyrocketing electricity prices. That killed another Oracle expansion they just canceled, and another one is trucking in gas for gas turbines as an alternative to the electrical grid, which you might imagine is expensive.

    Which brings us to now. The banks are looking at local opposition blocking these projects (local action is working), states are blocking them to avoid getting voted out, hardware costs are shooting up, and the assets backing these loans are too small for so much investment.

    So the level of risk no longer works.

    —

    My personal theory is that Oracle is a sacrificial lamb. It’s a dead end tech company that lives on licensing fees, and they’ve fucked themselves on these expansions. They’re failing at being a hyper-scaler as margins decrease.

    I bet we see someone take Oracle private when their stock collapses, freeing the board of fiduciary duty to the stakeholders with a payout. This move is critical because it blocks other hyperscalers from putting in an offer to acquire their assets to shore up debt.

    OpenAI will acquire the now private Oracle through a special funding round and buy up their hardware for pennies on the dollar. This will absolve them of the debt obligations Oracle has to OpenAI that have killed their credit ($500b), and stabilizes the Oracle balance sheet.

    OpenAI will write this down and offer Oracle’s creditors equity stakes in lieu of cash, and will have acquired all their next gen hardware far cheaper than their competitors.

    This might even fuck over Nvidia, the incestuous funders of the AI circlejerk. If Oracle gets to write off their GPU debts then Nvidia loses a fuck ton of sales, tanking their stock price — they take that OpenAI equity offer and look like they’re playing the game. OpenAI wants to build their own chips anyways, just look at jalapeño.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      13 小时前

      Oracle can no longer get Wisconsin to supply power to the data center so it’s a $15 billion dollar paper weight.

      Fucking lol

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        13 小时前

        It’s even better because they signed contracts that guarantee that capacity to OpenAI, guarantee payments to their creditors, and Oracle is on the hook for it all with no outs.

        Which is why I think it’s all a play, oracle famously is very lawyer heavy, they wouldn’t sign such stupid deals for no reason.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          12 小时前

          they wouldn’t sign such stupid deals for no reason.

          Greed. The reason was greed. They bought into the hype and thought they could print money.

          And all the tech companies are doing it, Oracle was just the sick man of the bunch, and will be the first to fall, dragging the rest down with them.

          All because they’re offloading trillions in debt to special purpose vehicles, the same thing that tanked Enron, the difference is that Enron, with $400 million in debt, was lying about it, and the current tech companies doing the exact same shit, are disclosing the debt legally, but still hiding it in the fine print of their disclosures.

          The debt will still crash the economy, but at least it’s out in the open?

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 小时前

            Also Larry is not nearly as sharp or thorough as he used to be, and he’s turned into a bit of a crumugeonly headstrong dick in his old age. No 82 year old is as sharp as they ised to be, despite how people like to lie about it. No 70 year old feels 40 anymore either. He has made numerous mistakes inside Oracle, and now he has run the whole company straight off a cliff, as aging boomers will tend to do.

            • chaogomu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              11 小时前

              And tanking the entire economy is the process.

              Also, Larry Ellison (who can fuck right off) has leaned on his Oracle stock to fiance the buyout of all the media companies he’s gobbling up to build yet another right wing propaganda ecosystem.

    • tburkhol@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 小时前

      I don’t think it says anything about specific data center risks: capitalizing loans is standard operating procedure for these banks. It gets the loans off their account books, so they don’t have to hold capital to balance the risk, but they still get to collect management fees on the loans, regardless of whether they default. The big stories back in the 00s were residential real estate loans, but they do the same thing for commercial and industrial property.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 小时前

        Isn’t fact they are having a hard time offloading that debt an indication that other investors are shying away from it because they see the data centre risk?

        • eodur@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 小时前

          Any sufficiently advanced financial instrument is indistinguishable from fraud

        • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 小时前

          I offer you an IOU. I’m on a good streak, and the IOU is that I’ll pay you back over time with interest.

          You accept. You then find 9 other people offering IOUs of varying reliability.

          You package up all the IOUs into an asset group. In theory we all pay you back regularly, but some of us will not. With 10 IOUs it’s unlikely we’ll all default, so the asset is safer and your risk models can assess this.

          You still have the same amount of debt and risk on your hands.

          You turn sell the rights to the payouts from the group, in exchange for cash now, because paying $X for payback of Y% interest over Z years with Q risk is an easy to reason about deal.

          But your potential buyers squabble over Q, some don’t want to lose anything, some want to be risky.

          So you split that risk level out into groups and say “if the overall goes down, this group pays first, then this group, then this group”, and you’ve created a securitized asset.

          You’ve now sold off these assets to various groups, with defined risk levels, and you’ve made back money to offset what you paid out to the initial 10 IOUs.

          Now imagine you took IOUs from crack addicts who are talking a lot about the power transformer behind the mall. They say they need money for tools and this will be the big one. You’re intrigued.

          Odds are good this will pay off you think, those crackheads were excited and confident.

          Later that day you hear sirens. Like, a lot of sirens. It’s coming from the mall area. Huh.

          You still haven’t sold off all the slices of your asset, you were maybe hoping for more upside, and selling can take a while. But those sirens… they’re concerning.

          Maybe it’d be a good idea to swap out your asset for another one, or offer those slices at a discount for some higher than expected risk. So you go out and start making phone calls hoping someone else isn’t worried about it. The only people who are less worried are a biker gang you normally wouldn’t do business with, but you figure for a discount they’re happy to deal with the crackheads.

          (This was more about securities than recapitalizing, but kinda the idea)

          • tburkhol@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 小时前

            My impression is that commercial loan securitization is a little different.

            When you’re talking about residential mortgages, you’re talking about loans of a few hundred thousand, which is kind of too small for capital markets to bother. So the banks bundle them, like you say, and sell them in $1e8-1e10 offerings… Pension fund’s gotta park $100,000,000 somewhere, and that MBS is easier than actually managing 500 separate loans.

            When you’re talking about commercial real estate - and especially things as big as data centers - it’s the opposite problem. They need such big loans that only a big bank or even consortium of big banks can get all the capital together, then the big bank turns the loan into a bond offering, so investors can buy them in slices as small as $1e4… That bond may only have one or two loans in it, so it can’t necessarily get broken into risk tranches like the MBS.

          • Logi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 小时前

            With 10 IOUs it’s unlikely [they’ll] all default, so the asset is safer and your risk models can assess this.

            This is where my spider senses go off. Are we assuming that these IOUs defaulting are independent events? Even though they’re from 10 crack heads talking about stealing the same generator?

            • trolololol@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 小时前

              Yeh and they all hang out with each other and bribe the same police senators and bulk buy their crack dreams from the same dealer 3 AI companies

            • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 小时前

              Yes, probability gets much messier with correlated events, and most models assume independence. You can vary intensity/hazard in counting processes, but really there’s not much you can do at a certain point.

          • No1@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 小时前
            1. Own the politicians
            2. Get bailouts
            3. Avoid any legal or financial consequences
      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 小时前

        Yes. The banks are there to just be an intermediary for this crap. The part where they unload at a loss was not part of their plan.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 小时前

        Don’t worry, the people responsible in 2008 were held accountable. They also didn’t profit massively off the economic collapse. Frodo also got the ring to Mordor. He had some help, but the ring was ultimately destroyed.

        • DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          96
          ·
          14 小时前

          My favorite quote from The Big Short:

          In the years that followed, hundreds of bankers and rating agency executives went to jail. The SEC was completely overhauled, and Congress had no choice but to break up the big banks and regulate the mortgage and derivatives industries.

          Just kidding. Banks took the money the American people gave them, and they used it to pay themselves huge bonuses, and lobby the Congress to kill big reform. And then they blamed immigrants and poor people, and this time even teachers.

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 小时前

              I thought his biggest failure was his raining hellfire on whistleblowers, kids protesting, and immigrants, but I’m willing to debate this. The real sting is that we had such high hopes and we got …that, instead, and then Biden after. I was so happy when Obama was elected the first time.

              • jason@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 分钟前

                2009 should have been the end of trying to “reach across the aisle.” 2010 should have been the end of the filibuster.

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            13 小时前

            Dr. Burry! If the investors withdraw, what’s gonna happen here? Are we done?

            Honestly, I don’t know! The… the… The bonds aren’t going down! They won’t move! It’s possible that we are in a completely fraudulent system.

            Or… you’re, you’re wrong.

            Sure! It’s possible, I just don’t know how!

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 小时前

          One part of that is just a story. As for the other part: I’m glad Frodo made it with help from his friends.