• 34 Posts
  • 93 Comments
Joined 4 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2025年8月3日

help-circle






  • mainstream “journalism” is about rage baiting engagement. Anytime an article has an inflammatory title about what someone says 95% of the time they are being misquoted. In these hundreds of comments I’ve only seen your comment mentioning that. No one questions anything anymore, if its about something they don’t like then it must be true. Even though the futurism article directly links the article its talking about and the full quote/context of what the ceo was saying. I’m not a fan of waymo (and certainly not google’s evil ways) but facts seem to be a distant ancient theory these days. Pitchforks first then think later.

    idk if the author chose that title maybe its futurism itself but a more accurate description would have been something like “our cars are safe but we are also prepared/preparing for when something bad happens”. That doesn’t get clicks tho.




  • yes they should talk about it but that’s not what he’s reviewing. He’s focusing on the hype around the OS and if its even deserving of that. Why would a tech review bring in politics, it would come off as him just hating dhh and some would wave him off as a “hater”. I think the fact that he’s just talking about the software gives him credibility and shows that dhh is just a shit developer when it comes to operating systems. There’s already enough pieces about how he might be a shit human being but not enough about if he’s deserving of his merit just because he helped developed ruby on rails.