• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 个月前

    Honestly, this does seem like a valid use of the technology behind crypto. Definitely a more beneficial use than just value speculation like we have now.

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 个月前

      how does one become an irate anteater? is it mostly by lacking ants to eat and instead consuming only inaccurate thinkpieces about how the will-never-pay-you-the-bagholder casino “works”?

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 个月前

        you and your friend really should have spent any time at all looking into who runs worldcoin and how fucking monstrously dystopian it is before rushing into buttcoin of all places to defend the “valid use of the technology behind crypto” (???) you both imagined existed in the OP’s screenshot

        • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          10 个月前

          Cryptography isn’t cryptocurrency. It’s completely different

          • self@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            10 个月前

            yeh I know, so calling out zk proofs as “the technology behind crypto” really reads like calling hydrogen gas “the technology behind the Hindenburg”, doesn’t it.

            • bitofhope@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              10 个月前

              I don’t think that simile quite lands. Hindenburg worked as expected until its sudden catastrophic demise and hydrogen caused both the function and the failure. Zero knowledge proofs neither make cryptocoins work nor are they the reason why they don’t work.

              A more apt comparison is something like saying levers are the technology behind this perpetual motion machine.

              The design incorporates levers that fail to make the device function, but it’s not like levers are useless because of that.

              • Klear@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                10 个月前

                I mean, have you tried building the gizmo in the picture? Just because similar designs have always been used by scammers and crackpots doesn’t mean the tech is bad. Now, if you could invest into my startup…