LANoftheDead
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Chris Remington@beehaw.org to U.S. News@beehaw.org · 12 hours ago

Releasing Epstein files could jeopardise my appeal, claims Ghislaine Maxwell

news.sky.com

external-link
message-square
22
link
fedilink
76
external-link

Releasing Epstein files could jeopardise my appeal, claims Ghislaine Maxwell

news.sky.com

Chris Remington@beehaw.org to U.S. News@beehaw.org · 12 hours ago
message-square
22
link
fedilink
A court filing from her lawyers argues releasing the documents would "prejudice" her chances of a "fair retrial" should her request for one succeed.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • cheeseburger@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 minute ago

    Please become an hero, Ghislaine.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Everything is so backwards. Releasing facts and proof someone knowingly trafficked children to be raped might have an affect on their appeal!? That’s exactly why they need to be released. So the crimes that happened have a light shown on them, and victims have a chance for some semblance of justice.

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Your honor, I object!”

    “Why is that?”

    “It’s devastating to my case!”

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Why would that be? What could possibly be in those files, that makes her look even more guilty than a convicted sex trafficker?

  • Wytch@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Cool. Release the files.

  • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    11 hours ago

    THATS WHY IT NEEDS TO BE RELEASED

  • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It never occurred to me that releasing these files might cause child traffickers and rapists to actually have CONSEQUENCES. The horror. Anyways…

  • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There’s no way “more information I don’t have could be incriminating” can be spun positively, so we have this from her lawyers.

  • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s a risk we all are willing to take.

  • ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Gracious no, we wouldn’t want one of his primary accomplices to be inconvenienced by people seeing the full details of your actions…

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If it can, then it should. This should all be public information, and every unredacted detail should be made clear to the public so that no one can overlook it.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Sounds good to me

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “Prejudiced” by seeing the facts of the case? Right. That’s kind of the point, yes.

  • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Good?

    If your appeal requires everyone to have less information about what really went down, then I think were better off with you not having your appeal heard, no?

  • Lor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Good

U.S. News@beehaw.org

usnews@beehaw.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what’s functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Post the original source of information as the link.
  • If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
  • Advocating violence is not allowed on Beehaw in general.
  • If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
  • Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
  • Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 225 users / day
  • 339 users / week
  • 576 users / month
  • 1.73K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 2.54K subscribers
  • 1.15K Posts
  • 2.58K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
  • rs5th@beehaw.org
  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org