• dismay3915@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Persian(Farsi) also doesn’t have a word for “The”. We just say the word. There’s also no gender prefixes. The whole language is gender neutral.

    Our ancestors were really up to something thousands of years ago.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      And it kinda has me thinking what all of that extra fat really does for a language. I never feel confused about meaning when speaking Persian, so the the/he/she/it/they/them really can’t be doing that much heavy lifting if you can just completely ignore it and have a perfectly functioning language without it.

  • luciferofastora@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Let’s add dialects to the mess:

    While not written in “book” German*, colloquial German may feature des, dat, det or dit instead of das, shorten der to dr or elide parts (like the French l’, except it may be attached to the previous word): Das ist das Problem mit der deutschen Sprache -> Des isch’s Problem mit dr deutscha Sproach

    (“That is the problem with the German language.” Bonus: notice how the demonstrative pronoun “that” is also
    das? Just in case you were hoping it was restricted to “the”…)

    * Hochdeutsch or Standarddeutsch (“High German” or “Standard German”), originally a written form slowly evolved over centuries to be most widely understood and has since been formalised. Informally, the term is also used for a spoken counterpart properly called Bühnendeutsch (“Stage German”), which isn’t always quite as “pure”, hence my distinction.

    I bloody love my language.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t get it, is Russian the worst here? I understand Finnish and Polish are pretty difficult in terms of these things as well (?).

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    English acting like it’s not a fucked up language where “the big, red, round, wrapped box” is fine but “the wrapped, round, red, big box” is wrong.

    • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Oh, we know it’s fucked up. I still can’t spell recieve and receipt and I have to look up pretty much every single new word I learn to find out how it’s pronounced.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I thought through it and I’d wager a stiff draught that it ought not be so rough, though as I’m taught, it’s nothing to cough at that a sturdy, taut bough would snap under the weight of its idiosyncrasies.

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I haven’t had a proper crush in over a decade, but I think that sentence just might make it. That is beautiful, and thank you for sharing it.

    • farmgineer@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It sounds unnatural to me as a native speaker, but I don’t know that it’s “wrong”. Even the Germanic languages as a family don’t consistently have the same order for words like that, which is neat.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I know it’s not wrong, but it would definitely give one away as a non-native speaker and come across very awkwardly.

      • kantor@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh, no, it’s wrong grammatically too, they just don’t teach this unless you study linguistics. Most of all languages with fixed word order and some others have a natural order of adjectives. Tom Scott has a great vid about it.

        Yes, Russian has an adjective order too. “A big old blue car” would be «большая старая синяя машина», saying «синяя большая старая машина» implies that “big old car” is a specific term.

  • affenlehrer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I don’t know about Russian but at least Croatian which is also a Slavic language confuses the hell out of me (and I’m German)

      • hakase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Technically it’s the other way around - the ones German lost in comparison to Russian were the Instrumental and Prepositional (Locative).

        This is from the original 8 (or 9) cases in their ancestor, Proto-Indo-European: Nominative, Accusative, Instrumental, Dative, Ablative, Genitive, Locative, Vocative, (Allative).

    • DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      confuses the hell out of me (and I’m German)

      And rightfully so. I’m also German, I learned Sorbian (slavic minority in Lusatia), and I can very much feel your pain.

    • farmgineer@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Most (if not all) Slavic-family languages do not. Neither do Japanese nor Korean. Some languages have a partial system (i.e. no a/an but the to show definiteness). Some languages have both but do it differently (Scandanavian languages suffix the definite article on nouns, but the indefinite precedes the noun like in English). Languages are messy and neat.

    • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think it’s the case with most Slavic languages. My wife’s native tongue is Serbian, and knowinf when and how to use articles was one the hardest parts of learning English for her.

    • PostingInPublic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      21 hours ago

      And they aren’t clear when to use them either, it’s kinda cute when they look at you questioningly if they did correctly after formulating a sentence.

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Neither does Polish. I know at least one polaka who confuses the/a(n) 15% of the time.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        One of my Polish colleagues, who otherwise speaks pretty perfect English, seems to choose he/she/it at random when putting sentences together. Which is fine for objects, but misleading for people. “I saw a friend yesterday and she said such-and-such” for a male friend, and so on.

        • DeLancre@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Slavic languages notoriously have gender for every object. In russian “friend” have two variants, one for male gender, one for female. Same at least with Ukrainian and Serbian. So when I translate sentence to English (which only have one word for “friend”) I subconsciously use default word + she/he to empathize gender.

          It’s annoying habit, cause when I say or refer to “user” for example, I always assume it’s “he/him”.

          Guess same for your colleagues.

        • Dicska@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          …which sounds surprising to me, because AFAIK Polish also has separate he/she words (on/ona).

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I assume he’s aligning the pronouns to the gender of the noun, rather than the person. “Susie is a great worker, he’s very efficient” kind of stuff.