This is a toilet thought, please ban me mods.

  • Fleur_@aussie.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Damn, that’s crazy. Do you think the shape of someone’s genitalia has an effect on that velocity and diameter?

    • tankfox@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The optimal genitalia for urination has zero length. Imagine a frictionless laminar flow from a razor edged hole in your torso!

      • Fleur_@aussie.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’ve definitely seen public bathrooms where the previous occupant may have been utilising this technique

        • M137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You are doing a great job at showing everyone you have no idea what you’re talking about. What you replied to says there wouldn’t be any splatter etc.

          This post very single reply you’ve made here has only ticked more boxes on the list of showing your idiocy, ignorance and inability to understand basic concepts.

          • Fleur_@aussie.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Don’t let me stop you from having perfect piss aim by performing keyhole surgery on your abdomen

          • Fleur_@aussie.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Doesn’t matter how smooth the piss flows, when it’s coming out the torso it ain’t hitting the toilet

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        In theory, maybe. Yet in the real world, enough foreskin to interfere with the flow makes for a smoother flow with no spraying.