• agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ok, and not to defend it, but it is easier to install a flock camera or build a new building than to redo a logistics network.

    We should do reasons instead of ai and flock, but yeah, rebuilding a train system in the US is way more complicated and harder to do.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      it is easier to install a flock camera or build a new building

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_(data_center)

      785,000 sq ft (72,900 m^2)

      422 MW of power.

      Over five million gallons of water consumed daily

      I can’t imagine how that would have an impact on local logistics or civil planning.

      in March 2025, xAI purchased a 1,000,000-square-foot (93,000 m2) site in the Whitehaven area of Memphis… Plans for the expansion were initially revealed by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation when preliminary plans for the facility were filed on September 18, 2024, for the project “…between xAI, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), and Nucor Steel…”

      Wonder why they need proximity to the nation’s largest state-operated power generation.

      • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, that’s huge and it sucks on a local level, but making a functioning train network for the US would be something that would have to overhaul the entire logistical network for the whole country. Even if every local and state government was on board and all the citizens were five with it, that’s still a massive undertaking.

        It’s one we should do, but it’s still Herculean in scope

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          making a functioning train network for the US would be something that would have to overhaul the entire logistical network

          We have a massive network of legacy rail to exploit. What has been talked about largely involves upgrading and retrofitting existing lines, building out new terminals and expanding old small ones. In particular, just increasing the frequency of service on neglected lines - the San Antonio to Austin route is notoriously neglected, despite being a prime candidate for cheap and easy improvement that would save millions of road hours for intercity transit and exurban commuters.

          It’s one we should do, but it’s still Herculean in scope

          On a national scale, it is Herculean. But at a thousand individual points, it is a very straightforward and doable job.