• FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    Those are far more obvious when one is filming compared to glasses that can secretly film someone at any time.

    • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      23 days ago

      Unlike the security cameras that already do you mean… yeah?

      A school is a public place, there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        A school is a public place, there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy.

        I am fucking sick and tired of this absolute garbage argument.

        “No expectation of privacy” does not mean publicizing any video for any purpose is OK. It does not mean stalking is OK. It does not mean a goddamned panopticon is OK!

        What’s happening now – with every act potentially stored in perpetuity, psycho-analyzed, and fed into generative AI for the purpose of deepfaking or who knows what else – is in a wholly different category that goes beyond “public!”

      • Amy the Silly :3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        I don’t recall a student being able to bring a security camera to school. In fact, every single security camera I’ve seen in a school has (seemingly) belonged to the school, not to any individual.