• solidheron@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Well that sentence fails on a technical level on account that it has 3 verbs in one clause.

    Also it’s kinda nonsense because it’s like 2 layers of meta, assuming you mean problem is people that think that. I’d just assume people that do nothing about homelessness “are part of the problem”.

    It’s like I can ignore anyone that unironically says “you’re part of the problem” just because they can’t identify the problem

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Please never lecture anyone on grammar again. That was painful to read.

      Also, saying I think the problem is people who think people who advocate against homeless are the problem is pretty fucking straightforward. It is no different than the anti-woke. They think the problem is with the people’s belief there is a problem. Try re-reading what I said.

      If you still lack the ability to comprehend this please don’t respond.

      • solidheron@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You could say it’s grammar. It’s actually just basic communication lesson, don’t inject 3 verbs into 1 Clause

        Uhm it’s actually very roundabout and obtuse. Most societies don’t do thought crimes, unless they’re authoritarians crushing decent, so your have to explain why people who think that are a problem and articulate real world example of people who think that just for people to conceptualize.

        Your kinda proving my point about people who say “you’re part of the problem”

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Once again, you fail extremely hard on a grammar lesson. I am not sure why you act so cringe, but whatever floats your boat I guess.

          Three verbs in one sentence!? You really must be joking with this nonsense. Perhaps you are ESL trying to lecture a native. That would actually be hilarious, please tell me it is true!

          You don’t need a real world example to conceptualize shit. I will give one to you anyways.

          My community decided to remove seating downtown to detour homeless people from loitering. I lobbied against this and countered by developing a homeless plan with our local task force. The business owners didn’t want to solve the problem of homelessness. They wanted them gone. I was the problem for trying to solve the homeless problem.

          This exact issue has played out countless times across the country. This is because there are a lot of people that view homelessness as a form of punishment or just deserts if you will. You can’t fix homelessness because it is a natural result of the system and to upend this system is wrong. These people are the problem, they are preventing positive change.

          You kinda act like a complete idiot. That is okay, I still enjoyed talking with you. Cheers!