The US Postal Service effort to develop a sweeping new system for verifying mail ballots has invited a host of IT concerns among agency officials, with some describing the process internally as a “sh*t show,” according to a new whistleblower report released Tuesday by a Democratic senator.

The unnamed whistleblower is alleging that some of the procedures USPS is planning – under mandates put forward by President Donald Trump – have been hidden from the public. Those procedures will make an already complicated and risky plan even more vulnerable to potential mass disenfranchisement, the whistleblower says.

The new report – which was assembled by the whistleblowers’ lawyers and released by Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal – comes as multiple courts are considering the legality of the proposal, which would require that states submit to USPS lists of their mail-in voters. The agency will not deliver ballots for states if there are any discrepancies between the voter information in the USPS system and what’s picked up by agency scanners on the envelopes of the ballots.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Voting in person isn’t much better when those machines are owned by musk and other far right extremist oligarchs. I seriously doubt the results of the last election. I don’t think we can not vote by mail where I live anymore. I trust the mail in ballots more than these shadowy voting machines

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What they’re going to do is “disappear” or delay mailed ballots based on the party the voter is registered as and/or their district and which way that district tends to vote. Not all of them, that would be too obvious. Just enough of them to tilt the election to the repubs.

    Don’t vote by mail at all if you have any other choice. If you do have a mail-in ballot, hand-deliver it to the election center (the place you would go to vote early) in your city or failing that, drop it in a ballot box, NOT a PO Box. If you’re forced to do it by mail, mail it as soon as you possibly can, then I’m pretty sure there’s a way you can call and verify it was received at the election center.

    But again, don’t vote by mail if at all possible. And if possible, go vote early rather than on Election Day–god only knows what they’ve got planned for that day. If you can, provide rides for people who need them so they can vote early too.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    States operate elections. States decide what is a valid or invalid ballot. USPS is not a state.

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That’s how it’s supposed to be. Unfortunately, that is not how it is right now. To even try to restore those states rights, will take the courts. And even if the courts are willing to do their jobs properly, the process would take years and we’d be lucky to see it resolved before the 2028 elections.

      This is Trump’s modus operandi. Fuck shit up and when the courts try to sort it out, drag things out as long as possible so that by the time a decision is made, you’ve already done whatever you wanted to do in the first place.

      Bottom line. Don’t vote by mail because your vote will not be counted that way.

      Edit to clarify their plan:

      When election officials bring ballots to their USPS site for delivery, either the entire batch of ballot envelopes or a sampling will be physically scanned – depending on where the ballots are being dropped, according to the whistleblower. If just a single ballot envelope scan does not align with the information in the portal, USPS will refuse to deliver the entire batch of ballots while the discrepancy is being sorted out.

      When you request a ballot for mail in voting, election officials mail it to you. The USPS plan is the hold up ballots before they are delivered to voters. If even one ballot is addressed to a voter/address that doesn’t exactly match the USPS list of allowed voters, then the whole batch will be held up until they sort out the error. That sorting out will not doubt not be completed in time for you to get your ballot and fill it out.

        • Manjushri@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          1 day ago

          No. That is not a solution. The USPS plan is to not deliver your ballot to you when you request it.

          When election officials bring ballots to their USPS site for delivery , either the entire batch of ballot envelopes or a sampling will be physically scanned – depending on where the ballots are being dropped, according to the whistleblower. If just a single ballot envelope scan does not align with the information in the portal, USPS will refuse to deliver the entire batch of ballots while the discrepancy is being sorted out.

          Emphasis mine. You can request a ballot, but there is every possibility that the ballot will never be delivered for you to fill out. Early voting is going to be a much more reliable way to insure that your vote has a chance of being counted.

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Any idea what the plans are in Colorado? Yeah, printing it out would be the best option.

              Still get to fill it out at my leisure and drop off at my leisure, with no concern for harassment by some Marklar douche or their ICE buddies. No lines. No stress trying to remember what to fill out or take a crib sheet, etc.

              Also - very convenient and I love telling the Marklars in other states that Colorado has been voting by mail for a very long time and I never stand in lines. They hate to hear it. They want voting to be a chore, especially for people that live in the “wrong” areas. :)

            • D@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Holy shit thank you for pointing that out. I’d personally recommend swapping out the rusty crowbar for rusty barbed wire, but that’s just me.

              • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                The Democratic Party needs to be broadcasting that option from the hilltops.

                When it comes to Colorado, so far, it doesn’t seem like we have the option. At least not yet. They did give us an additional SEVEN days for voting, because everyone can see what kind of fuckery donnie and the cons are up to.

                https://www.denverpost.com/2026/06/02/colorado-elections-voting-jared-polis-law-trump/

                Starting in November, Colorado voters will get an extra week to receive and return their mail-in ballots under new legislation signed by Gov. Jared Polis that also takes steps to insulate the state from federal interference.

                Under House Bill 1113, election officials can begin mailing ballots 29 days before an election, and drop boxes must accept ballots for 22 days before Election Day, each an increase of seven days.

                Also, this might be where they have allowed for some emergency decisions that would permit us to print our ballots.

                And it establishes a committee that could be convened in such an emergency to help draft new rules “to ensure the proper administration of an election.”

          • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I stopped trusting the mail for anything politicial ever since I participated in a postcard campaign for the 2024 election. I wrote a bunch of postcards to hundreds of people to remind them to vote, and I decided to write a few to my friends and family to verify that they were sent out. I stamped them, dropped them in the mailbox to be sent out on the day I was instructed to, and the 2024 election rolls around. I followed up with my friends and family to see if they got their postcards.

            Not a single one received them.

            Something undoubtedly fucky happened with the mail in 2024.

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Part of the conservative plot is to erode trust in government anything. Then they can dismantle it and sell it off for parts to the private sector.

              Education and the postal service are square in their targets and have been for decades. Same with things like Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid. Right now, they are stoking intergenerational conflict aimed at “boomers” with claims like they are “too entitled”, there are “too many old people”, and so on. Mark my words, that will be one of the drumbeats to take it away, put it into the stock market (or donnie’s crypto schemes). And it’s not like boomers will be the only ones affected, of course…

            • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              22 hours ago

              That’s why I’ve been saying that 2020 is likely the last free election this country ever had. Tons of pedo-fuckery happened in 2024 they’d made it their absolute goal to make voting nothing more than a symbolic gesture.

              Fuck. All. Of. Them.

          • AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            This was the goal all along. If the mail isn’t trustworthy, then there’s no reason to keep it around as a service. So we can get rid of it by transferring it to the highest briber bidder.

          • Manjushri@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Please see my previous post. By requesting a mail ballot, you are already trusting the USPS to get that ballot to you. Their plan is to disrupt this part of the process. They will be flagging whole batches of ballots when the election officials send them out, and they will hold up whole batches if even a single ballot recipient in a batch doesn’t exactly match their list of registered voters.

              • Manjushri@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                Probably, but it depends where you live how that will go.

                The details differ from state to state. In some, you’ll be allowed to cast a regular ballot, and in others you’ll cast a “provisional” ballot, to be counted once election officials determine you haven’t already voted.

                Provisional ballots are a whole other shit show. Republicans have repeatedly tried to invalidate provisional ballots cast in previous elections. If at all possible, early voting is probably a better option.

      • Triumph@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s in the fucking Constitution. There’s no question here. Six Justices are traitors.

        This will not be resolved by voting alone. (Edited for @[email protected])

        • Manjushri@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Voting has a much better chance of resolving this than not voting does. Voting is not perfect, but it’s what we’ve got. Stop discouraging people from casting their vote.

          • Triumph@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I am doing no such thing. Of course vote. You must. It is a necessary part of the resolution. But by itself, it falls short of a complete resolution.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Ideally, yes.

      But the post service in the US is federalized under the USPS. And the USPS has been run by an orangeboi sycophant for about a decade at this point, who had made numerous changes to make mail ballots - both distribution and retrieval thereof - more strict and difficult, with the net effect of disenfranchising millions of voters.

      Voter fraud is vanishingly rare.

      Electoral fraud is a standard and commonly used strategy by the GOP in particular.

      This is electoral fraud.

    • cenzorrll@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This isn’t about how States conduct their elections. Each state can have mail-in voting, there’s nothing stopping them from conducting their elections that way. The problem, which this is all about, is that the States rely on a federal service to do the delivering of the ballots part, which is what is getting fucked about with.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Is there any way states could do something to obscure what is being sent, I wonder?

        In the worst case, maybe they use library systems to get ballots as close to citizens as possible. Or offer a way to walk in to your nearest state government building and get one to fill out and drop off later.

        My largest concern here in Colorado is that we still have a way to do it at our leisure and that there is a huge window of time to exercise the picking up (if required) and the dropping off. Preferably many weeks.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      USPS is not a state.

      But they control the mail. Once you mail it, it’s in their hands to do as they want with it. Don’t assume they won’t do illegal stuff just because it’s illegal. We should all know that by now.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      States don’t operate their own postal services though, and this is the problem. A state can allow mail-in voting, but if the USPS doesn’t deliver the ballots, then the state effectively doesn’t have mail-in voting.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    1 day ago

    So that’s the plan - when Democratic states don’t comply to hand over their voter records, the postal service simply refuses to deliver their ballots from the Board of Elections. They can’t vote if they never get the ballot in the first place.

    • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 day ago

      And just like EVERYTHING else he ever does, it doesn’t matter if it is blatantly illegal, against the constitution, violates everything, if we don’t enforce it IMMEDIATELY then it is already too late and we are stuck with the consequences.

      He shouldn’t even BE president right now. He is illegal and illegitimate on account of commiting treason and insurrection. But no one enforced the law or constitution and so here we are.

      And they are going to keep doing that until we say ENOUGH.

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even if they do deliver them, I’m sure the verification process will be incredibly slow in blue states, so that the ballots will arrive after voting day.

      • brookenium@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        24 hours ago

        This is the heart of the plan. Postal delays ensuring these votes won’t be counted. Nothing “illegal” about “incompetence”.

        • AmyAye@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Meanwhile on Facebook posts about this, bots are pushing memes about how “The Democrats can’t cheat this time.”

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I still have to laugh how conservative idiots believed and still believe that Big Tech is liberal and that the liberals in Big Tech actively worked to “cancel” them, shadowban, etc because they were conservatives…when were any of them ever cancelled for discussing smaller government or lower taxes?

            No, if any of them had posts deleted or accounts given a time out, it was because they were doing something else like hate speech, etc…that for some weird reason, seems to be something conservatives require. Strange.

            Anyway, for anyone to think that FB, Youtube, etc., are “liberal” means they are in complete delusion.

  • Aqivex@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Someone should mail all the postmasters and the inspectors a letter reminding them that the concept of qualified immunity doesn’t belong to them, that dear leader probably can’t even remember who the current postmaster general even is without being told, and that they are not insulated from the finding out.

  • Alexfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    There will be so many lawsuits over purposely caused issues and other crises by November, the court will cancel it all and maga will say it’s just like Zelenskyy did so it’s fine. Two months to see if wrong!

    • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If we’re not facing an active, actual, missiles-in-the-air, tanks-on-the-border invasion and they try to pull that shit, then they’re even dumber than I thought.

      • Arancello@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The War with Canada (Special Military Operation) will provide the necessary justification

        • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I will hoist the Canadian flag and declare any property I control as Canadian if something like that were to happen.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          For the military to tell them to get fucked? That’s the one country they might actually refuse.

          • bthest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            They will never disobey. They’ll live in their own shit while starving in the middle of the ocean for a year and the worst they’ll do is send anonymous complaints via their momma who can’t do anything because she’s been locked up in a concentration camp.

          • ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I doubt it. They’ve stacked the TO with magats from top to bottom in the last 18 months, and the honorable ones have resigned.

            I’m oiling up my SKS.

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    If there are discrepancies like addresses? That means my mail in ballot is going to be flagged, because my house is in address limbo (used to be an apartment but not anymore, and USPS has rejected packages being sent to me because I did not put “Apt 1” at the end of my address).

    This is just going to disenfranchise those living between addresses and people caught in red tape living in apartment houses.

    Truly a shit show. I’m voting in person from now until question marks.

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Truly a shit show.

      As intended. This is not a well intended plan. The whole intention here is to disenfranchise voters because everyone knows, the move votes cast, the worse republicans do.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Not just that but any black hole you might find yourself in when two totally separate government systems don’t agree on one particular detail and neither agency wants to take ownership of the problem so it never gets fixed.

  • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Under the timeline sketched out to meet the September 1 deadline, there would only be four days allotted for it to go through a stage in the development process in which potential users of the system can test it out.

    I work on a live service video game, where we’re constantly releasing updates and new content. But our release pipeline length means new code doesn’t go live until it has been under test for at least a couple months. Because if someone finds a bug, there’s turnaround time to get it fixed, submitted, built, and re-tested, looking for any potential new issues that were introduced with the fix. That’s for a GAME. The idea that they might implement a verification system for MILLIONS of voters across MULTIPLE STATES and only have four days to test it before going live is horrifying.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Register as a Republican, and they won’t screw with you. Then vote Democrat, and completely screw up their plans.

    • zwerg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      They will claim massive voter fraud if there is a large discrepancy between registrations and votes.

        • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Confirms his goal is illegitimizing the idea of free and fair elections. Sowing doubt by claiming every single election that has taken place and will take place is fraudulent. Planting the seeds for the next J6.

      • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Don’t let that stop you, they will do it anyway. Why comply in advance, especially when you already know they are going to cry fraud?

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They will claim voter fraud if your mail-in ballot is received on a day of the week that ends in “y”

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Oregon has mail-in-voting, but also closed primaries so if I registered as Repiblican, I would only be able to vote in the Republican primary.

      • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        It’s not illegal, but in many states you can only vote in a party’s primary if you are registered as a member of that party.

        • Stache_@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Gotcha, so probably not a great idea. Local elections are really important too

  • trailee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The big benefit of mail in voting is that I don’t need to prepare in advance of going to the polls, or stand in a big line. I can sit down with my ballot at the kitchen table and read about issues or candidates as I fill it in. Once I’ve finished at my leisure, I take the ballot sealed in the return envelope and drop it off at a nearby polling place - most libraries are great for this and have drop boxes at the ready for a few weeks leading up to Election Day.

    Even if I procrastinate to the last minute I can drop the sealed ballot at an in-person polling place on Election Day without waiting in the big line. Mail-in voting is still excellent even if you cut USPS out of the picture for the return portion. Maybe better to call it Mail-Out Voting and make that the standard.

    Unless you’re out of state on deployment. Good luck getting Hegseth’s military to deliver any ballots.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hard agree with loving the vote-by-mail process, especially given the complexity of California ballots. But it sounds like they’re messing with getting our ballots mailed out to us in the first place. That means we would have to show up and vote a provisional ballot in person. Blargh.

      State could sue but not until the harm was done.

      • trailee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hmm, I guess you’re right. I guess I expected it to be on the return trip so that voters think they were successful and don’t follow up.

        If everyone is forced to vote provisionally, then not only will turnout be low, there will all sorts of further lies about how the provisional process is fraudulent.

      • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I believe you can print at home. This is how it works in WA and I’ve heard CA has a similar deal. There’s no need to use the postal service at all.

    • D@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That’s exactly the same for me. My ballot gets tracked from pick up to counting, and I can view my voting history online anytime.

  • 2hundredpancakes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    … judge last week froze the mandates that the states use the system if they want USPS to deliver their ballots, but said USPS could still offer the portal to states that voluntarily want to upload the mail voter information. The Justice Department is appealing that ruling.

    … USPS leadership was dismissive of concerns, and, according to the report “insisted that it was easy to understand what was needed and also that there was no time to write down the requirements.”

    … When election officials bring ballots to their USPS site for delivery, either the entire batch of ballot envelopes or a sampling will be physically scanned – depending on where the ballots are being dropped, according to the whistleblower. If just a single ballot envelope scan does not align with the information in the portal, USPS will refuse to deliver the entire batch of ballots while the discrepancy is being sorted out.

    Neat. I wonder whether they will even tell anyone when their ballots are invalidated.

    • Didntdoit71@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably not. They don’t care, either way, as long as your valid ballot isn’t counted, they win. Vote in person, if you can.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    the courts should be looking at the legality of interfering with mail delivery. A federal offense. It should not require anything more to stop it. The post office is a long and hollowed tradition going back to the birth of the nation. I hate how often I look at our country and think this is nuts.

  • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Are ballots legally required to be handled by USPS? Is there any reason a state cannot contract out handling of ballots to UPS or FedEx?

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If we look at the law, ballots don’t qualify as anything other than 1st class mail, which the USPS has a legal monopoly on.

      It’s one of the handful of things that can actually get you in trouble with the postal marshals. They raided the credit reporting agencies at one point for sending credit reports via scheduled courier when they were neither time sensitive, heavy , expensive or short notice.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They’re not time sensitive in the sense that the first class monopoly law means.

          https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/39/320.6

          The delivery window needs to be measured in hours for it to qualify.

          As for the postmark requirement, that would entirely depend on the state. Usually the law is written in such a way that it’s dropbox, hand it to clerk, or received by postal service. The postmark requirement is because it’s usually not permitted to give the ballot to someone outside of your home, but the postal service is an exception because they’re part of the government. There’s no provision in the law for accepting the word of a parcel service for when they got a ballot.

          States could change that but they’d run into the first class mail restriction.
          The best bet would be to permit a “moving drop box” where a municipal clerk could bring the box to your house. Make it like an ice cream truck playing patriotic music.