Fossy@programming.dev to Public Health@mander.xyz · 15 hours agoUS health officials exclude measles-related deaths in Pennsylvania from countswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up132arrow-down1external-linkUS health officials exclude measles-related deaths in Pennsylvania from countswww.theguardian.comFossy@programming.dev to Public Health@mander.xyz · 15 hours agomessage-square4linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareOpenStars@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·10 hours agoThat’s not what the article says though. The very next sentence after the title (is that a byline, even if it doesn’t contain the author’s name?) is: RFK Jr, the health secretary, has suggested the deaths were ‘fabricated’ while the CDC claimed it was reviewing them. There is no need to adopt their tactics: let the facts speak for themselves.
minus-squarecalliope@retrolemmy.comcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-24 hours agoI am directly quoting the article. Did you see that Kennedy says this about foodborne illnesses, when the article is about measles? He said the measles deaths were fake and blamed it on foodborne illnesses. The thing after the headline is called a subheadline. A “byline” is the author’s name. Hence “by” line.
That’s not what the article says though.
The very next sentence after the title (is that a byline, even if it doesn’t contain the author’s name?) is:
There is no need to adopt their tactics: let the facts speak for themselves.
I am directly quoting the article. Did you see that Kennedy says this about foodborne illnesses, when the article is about measles?
He said the measles deaths were fake and blamed it on foodborne illnesses.
The thing after the headline is called a subheadline. A “byline” is the author’s name. Hence “by” line.