So wait, is he being kicked out because Britain voted for Brexit or because of something he did? You’re not even keeping your story straight.
What do you mean, “my story?” I’m not The Guardian! They’re the ones claiming he’s being kicked out because of Brexit while leaving out the reasons why Swedish immigration authorities ruled against him three times.
Do you just lack reading comprehension skills or something? Why do you keep assuming random shit I didn’t say?
Of fucking course Brexit has something to do with it; it’s why he doesn’t have an automatic right to live in Sweden indefinitely. But that is not the same as being the reason his non-automatic application to stay failed three times. Clear now?
I don’t know why you’re so desperate to keep changing the topic, I’m just trying to keep it on what I was originally saying and you’re not so I’m done.
The bottom line for me here is that he shouldn’t have been kicked out regardless, after 24 years no matter what he did he should’ve gone through the Swedish penal system or something like that. Or it’s totally OK to kick people out after they’ve lived there for most of all of their lives and we should stop using that excuse in the other places.
I don’t know why you’re so desperate to keep changing the topic, I’m just trying to keep it on what I was originally saying and you’re not so I’m done.
I am sick and tired of your ridiculous false accusations.
Here’s what you actually wrote:
Sweden shouldn’t be allowed to do that, just like Trump shouldn’t be allowed to remove people who’ve been living in the US for 24 years.
I replied to the second half of that, the bullshit comparison between Sweden and Trump. You then posted a series of confused objections to things I didn’t claim while insinuating bad faith on my part, but at no point were we ever talking about the thing you apparently think we were talking about!
Don’t pretend “just like Trump” wasn’t your topic.
Wow, you went way out of your way to come up with a completely different understanding of what I said.
You were the only one who has tried to compare the method of removal, I’m still talking about the act of removing.
I’ll type it slower this time so you really get it: people shouldn’t be able to be removed from the places they’ve lived for most or all of their lives. Regardless of where that is or who’s removing them. It doesn’t matter what the reasons or method are it always results in pain and suffering.
Seriously, stop trying to act like you changing the subject is me changing the subject or me reiterating my point multiple different ways it somehow me not saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again.
What do you mean, “my story?” I’m not The Guardian! They’re the ones claiming he’s being kicked out because of Brexit while leaving out the reasons why Swedish immigration authorities ruled against him three times.
You literally called it a leopards eating faces situation and said that the UK was getting what they demanded.
The point is they ruled against him 3 times after he had been living there for over two decades.
If he didn’t oppose Brexit.
If brexit doesn’t have anything to do with it then why does that matter?
Do you just lack reading comprehension skills or something? Why do you keep assuming random shit I didn’t say?
Of fucking course Brexit has something to do with it; it’s why he doesn’t have an automatic right to live in Sweden indefinitely. But that is not the same as being the reason his non-automatic application to stay failed three times. Clear now?
I don’t know why you’re so desperate to keep changing the topic, I’m just trying to keep it on what I was originally saying and you’re not so I’m done.
The bottom line for me here is that he shouldn’t have been kicked out regardless, after 24 years no matter what he did he should’ve gone through the Swedish penal system or something like that. Or it’s totally OK to kick people out after they’ve lived there for most of all of their lives and we should stop using that excuse in the other places.
I am sick and tired of your ridiculous false accusations.
Here’s what you actually wrote:
I replied to the second half of that, the bullshit comparison between Sweden and Trump. You then posted a series of confused objections to things I didn’t claim while insinuating bad faith on my part, but at no point were we ever talking about the thing you apparently think we were talking about!
Don’t pretend “just like Trump” wasn’t your topic.
Wow, you went way out of your way to come up with a completely different understanding of what I said.
You were the only one who has tried to compare the method of removal, I’m still talking about the act of removing.
I’ll type it slower this time so you really get it: people shouldn’t be able to be removed from the places they’ve lived for most or all of their lives. Regardless of where that is or who’s removing them. It doesn’t matter what the reasons or method are it always results in pain and suffering.
Seriously, stop trying to act like you changing the subject is me changing the subject or me reiterating my point multiple different ways it somehow me not saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again.
FYI, I never disagreed with you on the morality of it to begin with. In fact, that’s why I didn’t address that point: I had no objections to it.
Now, seriously, for the last fucking time, knock it off with your needlessly combative attitude! You’re the only one here acting in bad faith!