• madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Dude this makes me just hate Israel more. I don’t know who’s giving them PR advice but EVERYTHING about Israel just makes them look more and more like monsters.

    I used to just brainlessly accept Israel = Democracy = Good

    The propaganda worked.

    But ever since this while AIPAC shit surfaced I finally saw just how horrific they are… Then I thought wait…maybe they are the assholes in the middle east too?

    Sure enough you look at what and who they are and it’s just pure evil monster.

    Before anyone jumps in Israel =/= Judaism

    Jews are fine.

    Israel are the baddies

  • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If, under the “Citizens United” precedent, a corporation is free to spend money on politics because “money is speech” under the 1st Amendment’s protection on freedom of speech… then a university has the freedom of speech to not spend money as they see fit.

    Plus the general concept of freedom of association that is part of our 1st Amendment rights.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Logically, you’re right, but these motherfuckers are operating on a slight modification of Wilhoit’s law:

      Conservatism Zionism consists of exactly one proposition … There must be in-groups Zionists whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups anti-zionists whom the law binds but does not protect.” --Frank Wilhoit”

    • anewfox@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      this bill is just the whole “freedom of religion, not freedom from religion” bullshit that christofascists believe.

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 hours ago

      AIPAC spends $50 to $100 million per election cycle, while also most likely directing a multiple of that in outside spending. And has been for decades.

  • SoupBrick@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Jake Auchincloss (Massachusetts)

    Kathy Castor (Florida)

    Gilbert Ray Cisneros Jr. (California)

    Jim Costa (California)

    Joe Courtney (Connecticut)

    Henry Cuellar (Texas)

    Donald G. Davis (North Carolina)

    Lois Frankel (Florida)

    Laura Gillen (New York)

    Jared F. Golden (Maine)

    Vicente Gonzalez (Texas)

    Greg Landsman (Ohio)

    George Latimer (New York)

    Susie Lee (Nevada)

    John W. Mannion (New York)

    Jared Moskowitz (Florida)

    Donald Norcross (New Jersey)

    Jimmy Panetta (California)

    Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Washington)

    Josh Riley (New York)

    Bradley Scott Schneider (Illinois)

    Hillary J. Scholten (Michigan)

    Kim Schrier (Washington)

    Brad Sherman (California)

    Darren Soto (Florida)

    Haley M. Stevens (Michigan)

    Thomas R. Suozzi (New York)

    Shri Thanedar (Michigan)

    Dina Titus (Nevada)

    Ritchie Torres (New York)

    Juan Vargas (California)

    Eugene Simon Vindman (Virginia)

    Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Florida)

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/every-democrat-who-voted-to-defund-schools-that-boycott-israel/ar-AA2bvV2v

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The problem here is that Zionism is more or less bipartisan. I wouldn’t necessarily bet my life savings on it, but given the number of states with anti-BDS laws I have no trouble imagining that such a law would get 60 votes.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I have no trouble imagining that such a law would get 60 votes.

            I can imagine I’m in Narnia…

            But it doesn’t mean my dog will start talking.

            If you think there are 60 who will vote for it, sit down and try to write down which Dems would. You’ll feel better when you cant get to 60

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Forty out of 47 Senate Democrats voted in favor of one of the resolutions to block a $295 million sale of bulldozers, which the initiative’s author, Senator Bernie Sanders, claimed would be used to demolish homes in the West Bank, Gaza and Lebanon. Fifty-nine senators — mostly Republicans — voted against blocking the sale.

                Thirty-six Democrats backed another resolution aimed at blocking a $152 million sale of 1,000-pound bombs to the IDF, which Sanders argued would be used in Gaza and Lebanon. Sixty-three senators voted against blocking the sale.

                So…

                You don’t understand how your link backs up my point?

                117th congress passed 2.0%, 118th passed 1.4%, and the 119th is about to end at 0.6%…

                In this congress 18,500 Bill introduced, 104 became law. Except for annual budget, almost all of them were very small things no one cares about. Something this big hasn’t been able to pass for a very very long time now.

                Senators not voting for one bill, doesn’t mean they’d vote yes for the opposite. That is an incredibly basic way to think

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago
          1. They don’t even do filibusters any longer. They just “call it”. They’re too lazy to actually filibuster.
          2. The filibuster can be surpassed at any time with a simple majority vote. This is called “the nuclear option” because that term scares the shit out of voters. But, it’s just a simple majority vote.

          The reason they pass budget reconciliations is because that’s what they want to pass. If they want something to pass, they skip the filibuster with a simple majority vote. If they don’t want something to pass, they say “oh no, the filibuster, so sorry, just not enough votes.”

          There have been something near 200 “exceptions” to the filibuster… all passed with a simple majority vote.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yeah…

            So “simple” to get 60 Senators on the same page in 2026…

            How the fuck did you think people needed that explained though?

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Making it illegal to *checks notes* stop buying things.

    I guess that’s what “freedom” means these days.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Most likely a trap for the House Dems stupid enough to vote for it.

      It hurts everyone, but it hurts people with a D by their name more.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “Socialism is bad; they will tell you what to buy. Also, government will take over businesses.”

    –Republicans, staying silent for this and for tiny-d donnie’s administration acquiring direct ownership stakes in public companies…

  • Janx@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “Freedom of Speech”… Apparently, it’s only for when you want to funnel dark money to extremist politicians, not when students and their schools (rightfully) criticize an ally.