Thought today’s smbc comic was too funny not to share. Source

  • EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The argument predates LLMs by decades, and in other forms it has existed for centuries. It doesn’t directly corellate to modern LLMs. It is an example of how a mechanism could mimic human intelligence without actually being intelligent. It’s a thought experiment. LLMs are not lookup tables, they are neural network based statistical models, but a similar argument can be made.

    • nezrock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Is there any actual material difference between what they’re describing (the computer equivalent of a philosophical zombie, I would say), and a true agi? Their point seems rather vacuous to me (all I did was read the Wikipedia article).

    • Dadifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That’s like saying the neural network in your head told you how to respond to my inquiry, so it’s not intelligent.

      • jnod4@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Well the neurons themself might be dumb cells, but together they can be quite smart, everyone is trying to draw a line of how many connections when a neural connection becomes sentient if it ever does become at all, which is a century old problem

        Are sparrows conscious? Cockroaches? Elephants?