You’re the only one being an absolutist. I called out that the article makes the foregone conclusion that there will be another president. It’s not a foregone that won’t. It’s also not a forgone conclusion that we will.
If we want to face a risk, we must first admit that there is a risk.
Not sure what you quoted there, but I never said those words.
I never said there wasn’t risk. My reply to your initial comment is pointing out that what you said is defeatist. Per my other reply, you can see that I literally said that the GOP could be successful.
You’re misquoting me and claiming I’m and absolutist when I never once said anything is certain, and I fact said the opposite.
You’re the only one being an absolutist. I called out that the article makes the foregone conclusion that there will be another president. It’s not a foregone that won’t. It’s also not a forgone conclusion that we will.
If we want to face a risk, we must first admit that there is a risk.
Not sure what you quoted there, but I never said those words.
I never said there wasn’t risk. My reply to your initial comment is pointing out that what you said is defeatist. Per my other reply, you can see that I literally said that the GOP could be successful.
You’re misquoting me and claiming I’m and absolutist when I never once said anything is certain, and I fact said the opposite.
I quoted my words so that you could see that I didn’t say anything absolute nor defeatist…