I assume that people drop out as they get tired. Eventually, there’s few enough people involved that it just no longer counts as an orgy. At that exact moment, some people are still going, but the orgy has ended.
Noting the charge levied in another comment on this, I’d amend to 5 people with a minimum of two bottoms.
A group of 5 people with 4 tops and 1 bottom probably changes the classification to a gangbang. 1 top and 4 bottoms, a reverse gangbang (and likely tricky to pull off). 2 tops and 3 bottoms, or 3 tops and 2 bottoms, would seem to form the minimum unit to be classified as an orgy. However, further study is needed.
I assume that people drop out as they get tired. Eventually, there’s few enough people involved that it just no longer counts as an orgy. At that exact moment, some people are still going, but the orgy has ended.
I suppose now the question is what’s the minimum number of people to classify it as an orgy. 5 is my best guess.
That sounds right. I’ve heard of a threesome. I’ve heard of a foursome. Never heard of a fivesome. Because that’s when it becomes and orgy.
But what about if it’s a gangbang instead?
So an orgy would need to have 5 people with either 3 genders or at least people of 2 genders.
Noting the charge levied in another comment on this, I’d amend to 5 people with a minimum of two bottoms.
A group of 5 people with 4 tops and 1 bottom probably changes the classification to a gangbang. 1 top and 4 bottoms, a reverse gangbang (and likely tricky to pull off). 2 tops and 3 bottoms, or 3 tops and 2 bottoms, would seem to form the minimum unit to be classified as an orgy. However, further study is needed.
LGTM
I think we have a scientific definition now
I’d prefer 5 separate genders at my origies, we have the technology
That’s homophobic…
Yeah, cracks in the wall found an issue as well. His proposed minimums of 2 tops, 2 bottoms and 5 people is better.