• Soggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Without doing any further research, I bet it’s a holdover from using Roman numerals (which has no 0) on clock faces.

    • redjard@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      I recall 0 had a fear around it, in the same way as negative numbers and complex numbers. People didn’t consider it real and refused to use it.

      Zero as a placeholder for arabic numbers was used long before people became comfortable with “a number without digits”; zero was just a placeholder, not a digit.

      I tried finding when zero as a number became used, but found that really hard since everyone instead talks about the digit/placeholder.
      Best I found is number.wiki which states India started using it as a number around 600. The introduction and popularization in europe around 12-1600 had it introduced as purely a placeholder though. “The nine Indian figures are: 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1. With these nine figures, and with the sign 0 … any number may be written”