• Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I never understood AMs and PMs. We start at 12, count upwards to 11, and do that twice? No fuck that, I just use a 24-hour clock.

    • Not a newt@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      What’s worse is that you get 10am, 11am, 12pm, 1pm… Who the fuck thought that was a good idea?

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ante meridiem and post meridiem. Before and after noon. (Noon being true noon, when the sun is at it’s highest point) Everything after 12:00 exactly is after noon and it makes more sense to change the notation there than 12:01.

        • redjard@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          12 should be 0, 0:00 is noon and 0:01 the minute after.

          1:23 is 1•60+23 minutes after noon or midnight.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Without doing any further research, I bet it’s a holdover from using Roman numerals (which has no 0) on clock faces.

            • redjard@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I recall 0 had a fear around it, in the same way as negative numbers and complex numbers. People didn’t consider it real and refused to use it.

              Zero as a placeholder for arabic numbers was used long before people became comfortable with “a number without digits”; zero was just a placeholder, not a digit.

              I tried finding when zero as a number became used, but found that really hard since everyone instead talks about the digit/placeholder.
              Best I found is number.wiki which states India started using it as a number around 600. The introduction and popularization in europe around 12-1600 had it introduced as purely a placeholder though. “The nine Indian figures are: 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1. With these nine figures, and with the sign 0 … any number may be written”

        • Not a newt@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          That doesn’t make it any better. In fact, it makes it worse, as you now got an am/pm shift in the middle of an hour. Compare this to the 24 hour time: it starts at midnight (00:00:00), and grows predictably up to 23:59:59.

        • bjc@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          are you saying am/pm change happens one second after 12? because no, they happen at the instant of 12.

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      More complex (so more cost), harder to read at a glance, you’d want to start at the bottom so that midday is at the top to align with the sun, absolutely minimal difference vs 12h clocks. This assumes a physical clock (face), not digital, but by the time (heh) digital came around it’s not like anybody is going to change anything.

      Now you understand am/pm.