Pronouns: He/Him (by convenience)

I’m in the process of regaining some social abilties online. The fediverse and no connection to my civil ID did wonders in this regard, despite my disposition to anxious ruminations and my weak social stamina. Anyway, happy to join a safe space to be open about my queerness.

From what I gathered, I can describe my identity and orientations as: bisexual, polyamorous, trigender, demiboy (I’m a.m.a.b byt he way.), non-binary, isogender, demicisgender. (Both cisgender and transgender seem to hardly fit my identity.) I’m also closeted.

Centralized profile on pronouns.cc : https://pronouns.cc/@un_trop_vert_timide

  • 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2026

help-circle
  • Wall of text incoming.

    But the thing is they dont.

    What make claim this general statement ?

    As religion has declined, the vast majority of people who used to go to church weekly haven’t replaced that by attending other community groups.

    • religion != going to christian a church or temple
      • even practicing christians can have their own way of practicing
    • non-religious people and secular social gatherings are much older than christian churches, and far more than any US church
    • how can can you even claim “the vast majority of people who used to go to church weekly haven’t replaced that by attending other community groups” ?

    And the “interest” part also fundamentally changes the nature of it.

    Yes, but what’s your point?

    People going to church were often going there out of a sense of obligation.

    I don’t know enough about the sociology behind this. However, this sense of obligation can also apply to gatherings not related to any christian church. Peer pressure and other social norms are not reserved to religious groups from the christian family of religions, nor to any religious or ideological group.

    Parents don’t drag their kids to the comic shop and make them hang out with people.

    Are you sure? I agree that not usual regarding a comic shop specically, but it still can happen. If not parents, other family members or friends can force someone into the forceful one’s favourite gathering evenet/place. The place can be a comic shop. I actually have been pressured by someone to participate to a very private cultural club regrouping a fraction of the community I talked about. That “someone” was a member of the club, but didn’t even ask other members consent before shoehorning me in. The club session didn’t take place in the shop, but in some members’ homes. Most accepted me, but still… others and I were forced to interact in this situations, and the only thing that helped is that we already interacted spontaneously and positively at several previous encounters.

    Parents do indeed drag their kids to non religious social hubs and make them hang out with people :

    • family events
    • village / town events
    • events with friends or colleagues
    • public or private ceremonies (marriages, veteran ceremonies, etc)
    • public events (fireworks, ball, promotional events, anything really)
    • sports, cultural, or other clubs, even when none of the parents is a member of the club
    • rallyes (the aristocrat networking event, not the vehicle race.)

    Friends or relatives from the same generation can also do the same, to the same kind of hubs, plus others like nightclubs and their afterwork equivalent (that matches “events with friends or colleagues”, but the noise and the mass of people adds much stress for some.)

    I’ve personnally experienced most of that when I was a child / teen, and still experience part of it. And although I was a roman catholic as a child, the only times this forced socialisation happened linked to church activities were linked to marriages, communions, baptism or funeral. I never took part in catechism, nor in periodic masses, or any parish event. That didn’t prevent me from finding a community. Actually, social norms and obligations were and still are one of the biggests obstacles preventing me from participating in significant way in a community. The others are social fears/anxiety, and poor mental health. (Due to working and living conditions degradation, as well as to the socio-ecological context, and the economics and politics that cause all of this. I hate the greed for any kind of domination, and the oppression and exploitation this greed encourages.)

    Anyway, I don’t understand your point about the “obligation” incentive, and the forced participation. It wasn’t part of the discussions when I first answered, so it’s not a point I discussed either.

    Communities and social interactions, wether linked to any religion or not, can and will happen without external constraints.

    The absence of pressure is even better. Forced social interactions are at best awkward and tiring. I usually find these abusives. They also implies power dynamics that will probably lead to further suffering, toxicity, or (potentially very serious) abuses. We should not encourage the use of religion as a domination system (or any such system really) to force and structure social interactions and community.


  • The religion itself often ends up being quietly secondary to the community building, and I still don’t know what replaces the Church for the non-religious.

    What can act as community hubs are very dependant of the community, but really don’t need to relate to religion. Especially if they serve as hub for people from different religious backgrounds

    Aside from the places linked to religious activity, from any religion, the places that come to my mind, partly from my own experience, are:

    • Local dedicated community centers, where they exist.
    • Associations & clubs (the sport of school kind, not gentlemen’s clubs)
    • Sometimes shops.
      • The best community hub I used to go to was actually a “booksshop” dealing in mangas, anime, video games, and tabletop games. They often organised nocturnal tabletop gaming events. The shop served as a social hub even outside of these events, and the community was a safe place for some us not “misfits” (special interest nerds, LGBTQIA+ teens and adults, etc).

    In other words, any community driven or community focused place or organisation can serve as a meaningful cosmopolitan social hub. People will gravitate naturally toward the hub·s centered around their interests. (Be it a religion, a sport, a social cause, a subculture, etc.)




  • Sooo, the US government’s new propaganda tool are games inherited from the terrible sexual or violent “adult” “games” so common from the 1980s to the 2000s ? I mean crap like the Postal series or so-called “mature” games which were just bad games with a discriminatory content decorated with sex or additional violence. (Take a popular or simple type of game, create a very low quality game of this type, then slap a porny or gory skin on it, insert many sexist, sexual, and racists joke, and voilà!)




  • We know that Trump is only the chaotic mouthpiece for a much larger and much more problematic power structure in the USA.

    A power structure that has been quietly and increasingly fucking the rest of us for decades. Trump simply ripped the mask off and got loud about it.

    Not just in the USA. All around the world, mainly among the self proclaimed “(representative) democraties”, which are many countries. (The openly authoritarian regimes are already authoritarian, but can still progress toward more intolerance.)

    And yes Trump, while himself being the symptom of these systems current state, has acted as a catalyst for the march toward hateful authorianism.



  • Agreed.

    There was a famous case in France several years ago, around the freshly dead heinous monster named Jean-Marie Le Pen. His “orator talents” were praised after his death, both by dominant media and dominant politicians, including supposed to be ennemies with him and his legacy. Those who still publicly stood against him and his legacy were told to rospect the dead and were vilified. But as some members of communities he targeted said: “I will respect him in death like he respected us while alive.”

    The man was a white national-supremacist with ties to the OG nazis. Racist, imperialist, xenophobe, LGBT-phobe, redheaded-phobe(?), … He very probably participated with enthousiasm in torture and other mass crimes from the french side during Algeria’s independence war. (Also, colonialisation is a mass crime in itself.)

    So yeah, fuck forced reverence. This guy was a hateful mass criminal, and his death didn’t change this fact.