The admins on lemmynsfw.com have decided to allow “non-IRL loli”, i.e. drawn porn involving children/teenagers. (Post: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29633).

Irrelevant of the moral issues that this poses, such content is illegal in many countries (e.g the UK). Continuing to federate with lemmynsfw.com will put users at risk of significant legal repercussions.

Please would the admins consider defederating unless lemmynsfw change their policy.

UPDATE: The lemmynsfw admins posted an clarification here: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29826. My original argument for defederating doesn’t stand any more.

  • Ruud@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    If any illegal content would be posted there, let us know. If it’s 1 community, we can block the community. If it’s all over the place, we can defederate. But I see defederation as a last resort. If there are other ways to keep our server safe I prefer that.

    • kinther@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for taking the conservative approach to moderating instead of nuking from orbit.

    • AndreTelevise@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They did make a poll and then later announced they’ll be banning underage anime art and IRL imagery . But not art of cute/short characters because it’s impossible to discern if they’re over 18 or not. It’s the whole Pokemon debate all over again.

    • Melon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s worth pointing out that legality depends on jurisdiction and while it’s obviously a requirement to obey the your (and other admins’) local laws, it’s not quite so clear-cut when it comes to other countries.

      Eg. It’s illegal to criticize Hong Kong’s government under their National Security Law. But I think we’d (the community here, not just you and me) agree that lemmy.world has absolutely no obligation to follow that law.

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    2 weeks ago: Lemmy is so amazing, create an account anywhere and you can access everything! It’s like forums but better!

    Now: defederate >:(

    Ugh. I get the concern in scenarios like this, but in the last couple of days every instance has calls to defederate from this or that. Eventually it’s just gonna be small islands of “very compatible” instances.

    Well, guess it’s back to making separate accounts for everything!

    • aski3252@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      With the idea of self-hosted decentralized servers also comes a responsibility. With sites like reddit, the corporation behind it is responsible for everything, including moderating potentially illegal content. With lemmy, this is on the individual servers to handle.

      I think it’s a bit silly to get all dramatic and say stuff like “Well, guess it’s back to making separate accounts for everything!” just because instances allowing potentially illegal cp are to be de-federated…

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a bit dramatic. Most of the big instances will stay federated with most of the others.

      Some topics that are just too intolerable to the general population will get isolated. Pedo content, Nazis, etc. if you feel you need to make a second account to go participate in those things, well you do you I guess…

      • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, Beehaw already defederated from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, a few fairly normal instances don’t federate with lemmy.ml, even more don’t federate with lemmigrad, calls to defed from lemmynsfw were there from its very first day, never mind burggit.

        Like, okay I get it that it’s not a drop-in Reddit replacement and instance owners can do whatever they like - but I still wonder where it leads at the end.

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well lemmy.ml is run by pretty much the same people as lemmygrad. Before the Reddit drama .ml was filled with mostly the same kind of politics. They chose the .ml extension to signify Marxism-Leninism I believe. So it’s not that surprising that some have blocked them.

          But anyway, where does it lead? We’re just in flux. Everyone is figuring everything out. Instances will stabilize. Norms will be established. Everything will be fine. Some pockets will get isolated, but I believe the vast majority will stay together. Once in a while there will be some drama, some splits and spats. It’ll be fine, people will shift. Balance will return.

          • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, maybe. I’m just skeptical and feel that people have more of a tendency to isolate their islands rather than connect.

            And once the disconnect happens, it’s difficult to reverse.

            Maybe I’m wrong. Guess we’ll see.

            On the other hand, there’s the advantage that if one finds “their own” instance, they are free to speak out their mind, while in the big melting pot there’s always a risk of offending somebody by just being a little edgy. Whether that’s actually a good thing…

  • sorenant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think those countries should put the resources used to go after neckbeards fapping to drawings to investigate people trafficking real children.

    • purahna@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the venn diagram is a circle

      also, that aside, “the resources” here are a little different, mounting investigative operations to bust lolicons/pedophiles (same thing) requires more resources than just flipping the switch off on some pedophile’s ability to communicate freely

      • sorenant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you the kind of person that says people playing FPS games are more likely to become mass shooters?

        It might not be our liking but loli is at worst a victimless crime, not the same as the real pedophiles (eg Epstein’s associates, like Prince Andrew). I think by saying they’re the same, you’re actually belittling the gravity of the other.

        • Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not the assault, violence or having a victim making them a pedophile. It’s the attraction to minors. It doesn’t matter if fictional or real, they are pedophiles.

          Many of them probably even act in it, e.g. masturbation.

          • sorenant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s reprehensible but if they’re not really acting on it, as in harming someone else (masturbation, really?), then why should it be a crime and the state be involved? What are you suggesting is that the mere thought of it, involving fictional people at that, should be a crime. Are we certain we want thoughtcrime?

            That sort of vilification only makes them more likely to hide instead of seeking professional help. Why would they, if doing so would open them to ostracization?

            • Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You are jumping to conclusions here. Also just thinking of extremes is not helpful. Acting on your desires to perform sexual acts with children is absolutely pedophilic behavior. So masturbating is just that. It is not just a thought, it is an action. Even though non pedophiles don’t even have these thoughts without disgust.

              Just ask yourself, would you ever be comfortable leaving a child alone with someone who sexualizes children? My answer would be absolutely not, they are pedophiles and a huge risk to the childs safety.

              How to solve this or manage the risk is another way more complicated topic.

        • purahna@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is a really good argument until you learn that mass shooters are less than one in a million but child sexual abusers are more than one in a hundred, despite there being tens of millions of FPS players and probably only hundreds of thousands of CSAM consumers in America. It’s a catchy gotcha but it completely fails to hold up under material scrutiny.

          Mass shootings and child sexual abuse are very different things, and so are CSAM and video games. You would benefit from losing some of the reductivism you’ve got there.

          • sorenant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re actually supporting my point. Despite tens of millions of FPS players, there’s only less than one in a million cases of mass shooting. Meanwhile child abuse is more common despite loli stuff being uncommon in US compared to places like Japan. This to me seems like an argument to say there’s no correlation between the fictional and real counterparts.

            If anything, being unable to set apart reality from fiction and saying both are the same is the reductionist stance.

  • miridius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would we need to defederate? Just don’t subscribe to their communities and you won’t see their content

  • Wolfric1982@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    At least with jerboa you can turn off NSFW so you don’t need to see it. Alternatively just stick to local or subscribed and you don’t have to worry about seeing anything.

  • redeyedstranger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wish there was a way to exclude the whole instance from my personal feed without requiring admins to defederate it. Right now I have to play whackamole with new communities popping up. And it’s not just the NSFW stuff.

    • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m taking the opposite approach, that is, instead of blocking what I don’t want to see, I join what I do want to see.

      Blocking is not effective if you want a “curated” feed IMO, new communities are being created all the time, especially now that many are migrating over from reddit, you might never “end” blocking stuff.

      OP post is a different situation though, that kind of content is illegal in many countries (especially EU), just being federated with them could pose a legal risk, it’s not just stuff some people don’t want to see.

      • CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been browsing through new as a way of finding communities to join. The NSFW stuff in that feed is unideal but easy enough to ignore, whereas content that could send me to jail is a whole different ballgame.

        • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          whereas content that could send me to jail is a whole different ballgame

          Exactly. And as someone else already pointed out, it just takes a single user subscribing there to have that content cached here, that would put all of us at risk from a legal point of view.

  • MalachiAzrael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They did post an update about it

    Looks like its less about blatant loli/shota content and more about “characters who are petite/young-looking but not obviously underage”

    How and if that changes anyones feelings about it is up to them.

    • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its pretty much the same with lolli shit, most don’t like it but it’s not illegal where the server is hosted. If you don’t want to see shit, block it yourself. You don’t need a instance admin to do it for you, we aren’t on reddit where everything has to be PC and advertising Friendly.

      • impulse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty sure we are hosted on Hetzner in Germany, which makes this very problematic, especially if the admins of lemmynsfw aren’t able to properly identify illegal content right away and it spreads through the whole network.

        • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah… Yeah in Germany its not illegal to own it, but the Distribution is, at the moment however, i would argue in favor of waiting a day or two to see how they do it, they recently made a update on this policy.

            • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Its not child porn its drawings and thats legally a different thing

              Pornografische Darstellungen, die den sexuellen Missbrauch von Kindern zum Gegenstand haben, unterliegen gemäß § 184b Abs. 1 StGB einem absoluten Verbreitungsverbot – auch wenn sie ein fiktives Geschehen zeigen.[5] Sowohl das Verbreiten und Zugänglichmachen als auch entsprechende Vorbereitungshandlungen werden mit Freiheitsstrafe von drei Monaten bis zu fünf Jahren bestraft. Der Besitz von Darstellungen, die ein rein fiktives, nicht wirklichkeitsnahes Geschehen wiedergeben (vgl. § 184b Abs. 3 StGB), ist dagegen nicht rechtswidrig.[6] Laut einigen der bekanntesten Anwalt- und Rechts-Portale ist dies so zu verstehen, dass fiktive Pornografie von Kindern und Minderjährigen, bei der es offensichtlich ist, dass es sich um rein fiktive Werke wie zum Beispiel Cartoons und Comics oder Anime und Manga handelt, in Deutschland weder strafrechtlich verfolgt werde noch rechtswidrig sei. Eine Ausnahme sei, wenn nicht ohne Weiteres erkennbar sei, ob es sich um eine computergenerierte Darstellung oder ein reales Geschehen handelt.[7][8] Die Bundesregierung stellte bei dem Gesetzesentwurf ergänzend klar, dass der Straftatbestand „auf die Fälle beschränkt bleiben“ solle, „in denen durch Videofilm, Film oder Foto ein tatsächliches Geschehen wiedergegeben wird“. Demgegenüber sah sie bei „kinderpornographischen Romanen, Zeichnungen und Zeichentrickfilmen“ den Strafgrund der Regelung nicht als erfüllt an, weil deren Besitz nicht dazu beitrage, dass Kinder als „Darsteller“ bei pornographischen Aufnahmen missbraucht würden. Der Abschnitt „wirklichkeitsnah“ wurde später für fiktive Darstellungen aufgrund der rasanten technischen Fortentwicklung und Perfektionierung virtueller Darstellungen hinzugefügt.[9]

              -Wikipedia

              Furthermore “Lolli” is a very stretchable word and is often used for shortstacks in general or flat chested in general.

  • MeowMeow86@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m still trying to understand this whole app/situation, it makes zero sense to me lol. Is there not a way to block? This situation is definitely worth blocking because it’s fucked up.

    I’m more so just curious if it’s sent to main feeds or being sought out? Just want to learn to avoid this in the future. I don’t agree with the negativity of reddit to all downvote and ban at any chance they can but saying “I’d never do this but weirdos voted so we’re a pedo sub now” is fucked

  • buckybeaky@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A quick glance at the post gave me the impression lots of people from that instance are against the change. I’d wait and see how things settle before defederating. Defederating is detrimental to lemmy/kbin growth, it should be a last resort approach.

    • CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with that approach is that it puts users here in legal jeopardy. Right now if I browse “All” rather than “Local” I’m risking jail time

      • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then block the nsfw communitys… You can do that yourself, if you don’t want to be with them sign up for another account at a instance that blocks them completely.

        • blackdragoness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem with that is there are so many. Id rather just be able to block the entire instance all at once. I know for certain I want nothing from lemmynsfw period or any other porn instance. I should be able to just block them off.

  • query@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    UPDATE: The lemmynsfw admins posted an clarification here: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29826. My original argument for defederating doesn’t stand any more.

    Drawn a.k.a. not real and not obviously underage a.k.a. not attempting to depict illegal situations, doesn’t seem like a problem.

    Although I agree there should be more ways to filter instances, per user. A blacklist along with the whitelist that is subscription. Show local, show subscribed, show everything (except blacklisted).

  • nivenkos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    With AI-generated images too this is a real minefield.

    Honestly I’d rather we just de-federate from porn instances entirely, people can sign up there directly if they want that.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t have any issue if:

      1.) it were moderated at least semi-decently

      2.) we got the option to hide NSFW communities from “All”, while still keeping “show NSFW” on in our settings. Otherwise it’s just really inconvenient to go to settings and flip that on and off every time you want to go to such a community or see a NSFW post that’s not sexually explicit. They use the tag for other things too.

      • OtakuAltair@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        we got the option to hide NSFW communities from “All”, while still keeping “show NSFW” on in our settings

        This seriously needs to be a thing asap

  • ComputerSagtNein@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tbh, I feel like it actually should be defederated. I am not against porn, I literally made an account there like I have a separate account on reddit for porn, but I would love to not have all the porn stuff flooding the feed on my sfw account. Sadly there are no convenient filter options yet as it seems.

    • ComputerSagtNein@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That said, I would prefer if Lemmy had proper filter options. As long as something is within the law, I am okay with others to consume it, even if I don’t want to consume it. It’s like political opinions, religions etc. Stay within the law and you can do whatever you want - I don’t always like it, but as long as I can filter it out I am fine with it existing.

      • ComputerSagtNein@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but that’s not quite what I want. On Synch for reddit I have the option to filter out porn nsfw - that’s what I am looking for.

      • DanNZN@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dug around and found that which is nice but I wish they put it more prominent in the UI. In the filter section would be great.

        • Code_a@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There is also a big red button on the left that says “Block Community”

          • DanNZN@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I meant to temporarily filter NSFW from showing in the feed but a quicker/easier way than toggling it in settings.

      • michikade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish there was a way to separate NSFW a little more - I don’t mind NSFW stories and adult language and so forth when scrolling but if I’m in public I don’t want to scroll All and see porn. I have no problem with porn, but to me there’s a time and place.

        When I have NSFW disabled, I’m losing entire communities that I read the stories from because sometimes the content does 100% need the warning flag that it might not be for general audiences, but I don’t mind seeing an R rated movie in public while I won’t go see an NC-17 movie or an X rated movie in a theatre, personally, if that makes sense.

        • Senokir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Out of curiosity, what communities are you subscribed to that entirely consist of posts that are marked nsfw that aren’t porn? Not saying you aren’t having that experience but I just can’t think of any communities like that that I’ve come across. Certainly there will be some posts like that but losing entire communities by disabling nsfw in public?