Don’t need an LLM to know the date ended ten seconds after they explained they were going to record the conversation for performance review

  • [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    It’s very likely that we’re ruling out a lot of people with whom we might have been happy, but who don’t meet the expectations on our list or our visual standards within the first 10 seconds. In this regard, meeting people in real life works better because we tend to engage more deeply with them (partly due to the smaller selection) than we do when briefly scanning a 10-word online profile with 5 pictures.

    In my experience we also dismiss a massive number of people subconsciously in person, where seeing someone in passing is basically like the swiping step. Actually going on a date is the same in both approaches.

    Actively dismissing might reinforce our visual biases, but as a trade off of being aware of more people who are interested in having a relationship.

    • GardenGeek@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      but as a trade off of being aware of more people who are interested in having a relationship.

      Let me just jump in here for a moment:

      That’s the theory. In the real world of modern online dating (of course, this is all just anecdotal evidence from me and a few colleagues, so take it with a grain of salt), there are also a lot of people on dating platforms who, for a wide variety of reasons, aren’t emotionally available for a relationship at all. Some are looking for no-strings-attached fun, others are going through a breakup, and still others are seeking attention and validation… In any case, not everyone you’re matched with is actually interested in a relationship or even in getting to know someone seriously. I’d even go so far as to say that this realization causes a bit more pain online than (as you correctly pointed out) in real life—where this also happens—because the platform operators naturally cultivate the expectation that “true love” (whatever that may mean to you) is just a click away.

      I think we can perhaps agree on the following summary:

      In theory, a platform where all adults who are interested in a relationship and are self-reflective can meet is a great idea because it expands the pool of available partners and allows you to weed out your personal no-goes beforehand without wasting time. In reality, however, due to the business model, our modern society, and human nature, quite a few pitfalls.

      …and perhaps I just suck at online dating and therefore advise against it. After all it’s a pretty personal topic. ^^

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Some are looking for no-strings-attached fun, others are going through a breakup, and still others are seeking attention and validation… In any case, not everyone you’re matched with is actually interested in a relationship

        Those are all relationships. Not long term stable ones, sure, but they all fall under the relationship umbrella.

        • GardenGeek@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Depends on your definiton of relationship.

          If we define the term broadly enough, every human interaction is a relationship because we have some kind of relationship with the individuals we interact with.

          • [deleted]@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Or we could acknowledge there are sexual, romantic, and other relationships that are commonly between two people and called relationships in the context of dating instead of diving headfirst into hyperbole.