Maintaining an unsubtle and primitive view will not help ring-fence and protect human creativity. Your words are just noise and add only confusion and distraction to an argument that needs to be clear and precise. AI model output can be inspired and creative, even while in the strictest sense this is still just human creativity repackaged. The most vital thing is that it has to be reliably labelled as AI generated and its primary sources acknowledged, then it can be judged legitimately on its own merit.
“Human creativity repackaged” the jokes write themselves, these joyless clowns don’t want to do the necessary work for creative ideation and yet they yearn so much for their llm enabled intellectual cuckoldry to be recognized. It always comes off as pleading. This is the main reason why it’s so difficult for AI content to be properly labeled as AI; Because while the AI users want to promote themselves as the “next step of human creativity” Once it is labeled as AI assisted people stop caring.
So sorry for not enabling the induced Dunning-kruger maybe you should talk to an llm that enables and supports your views unconditionally and calls your way of thinking “precise thought”. Than come back and share with us some more of your ai psychosis.
You are foaming at the mouth, I do not see how you think that can help things. Listening to a little counter argument might advance matters but that is not really your aim is it cuz. You want lynchings because that’s what you like.
In 1141 when Matilda took power to be the first ruling Queen of England in the full sense of female King the clerical chroniclers of the time falsely accused her of arrogance to demean her and undermine her legitimacy.
No, it can’t, because inspiration and creativity arise out of brains, and LLMs don’t have brains or anything similar to brains. They just output tokens that are statistically likely to appear together.
Ai is not human, it is a corporate product fuck this idea that the stochastic parrot is “inspired" fucking llm’s are not inspired by shit.
Maintaining an unsubtle and primitive view will not help ring-fence and protect human creativity. Your words are just noise and add only confusion and distraction to an argument that needs to be clear and precise. AI model output can be inspired and creative, even while in the strictest sense this is still just human creativity repackaged. The most vital thing is that it has to be reliably labelled as AI generated and its primary sources acknowledged, then it can be judged legitimately on its own merit.
“Human creativity repackaged” the jokes write themselves, these joyless clowns don’t want to do the necessary work for creative ideation and yet they yearn so much for their llm enabled intellectual cuckoldry to be recognized. It always comes off as pleading. This is the main reason why it’s so difficult for AI content to be properly labeled as AI; Because while the AI users want to promote themselves as the “next step of human creativity” Once it is labeled as AI assisted people stop caring.
So sorry for not enabling the induced Dunning-kruger maybe you should talk to an llm that enables and supports your views unconditionally and calls your way of thinking “precise thought”. Than come back and share with us some more of your ai psychosis.
You are foaming at the mouth, I do not see how you think that can help things. Listening to a little counter argument might advance matters but that is not really your aim is it cuz. You want lynchings because that’s what you like.
That’s good man! you are writing some fiction about my reaction! Keep doing that and you might stop needing the LLM’s.
In 1141 when Matilda took power to be the first ruling Queen of England in the full sense of female King the clerical chroniclers of the time falsely accused her of arrogance to demean her and undermine her legitimacy.
Subscribe to [email protected] for more unrelated historical facts.
No, it can’t, because inspiration and creativity arise out of brains, and LLMs don’t have brains or anything similar to brains. They just output tokens that are statistically likely to appear together.