• osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Smarter people than me can do it better, but imagine a simple a/b test. 10 videos, 5 with settings A 5 with settings B, give all a [statistics] amount of views. One set gets more slop flags than the other. Tweak settings/model and repeat until they don’t get flagged anymore.

  • ell1e@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t believe for a second YouTube didn’t try to intentionally push slop, hoping users would be satisfied so that they could cut out human creators. I bet the only reason they’re now backtracking is that people hate it.

    • The Anti-AI Leader@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      YouTube has always tried to ‘push the boundaries’ but can never handle when the boundaries push back somehow. Not to mention they are likely utilising AI in their crappy algorithm

      • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Not to mention they are likely utilising AI in their crappy algorithm

        I mean, they always have. YouTube’s whole job is to get you to watch more YouTube. It sees you watched video A so now it trys to figure out what else you might like to watch next so it suggests video B based on your interests and watching patterns. What the algorithm specifically prioritizes has changed a few times, which is why there’s been fads in the algorithm. But determining what is something you’d be interested in isn’t something that’s easy to put directly into code, but something that can “vibe” it out is a much better tool to use. Its actually one of the better use cases for AI (AI in broad terms not specifically LLMs or other generative slop currently on everyone’s shit list).

        • The Anti-AI Leader@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Not when it first started they didn’t. In the noughties, when YouTube stopped being a dating site and started being a video-sharing site, the algorithm was pretty simple: first upload, first serve effectively. It’s only over 2 decades that meddling fingers have bastardised that poor site with AI and sloppy algorithms that churn up the muck and put crap in your feed

    • Akh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tech bros insist people cant tell, the rest of the world is like, dude we can tell and hate it.

    • The Anti-AI Leader@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They really shouldn’t. If you have to depend on an alleged ‘intelligent’ computer program to tell you even basic things like what to do every day, you’re doing something wrong.