• Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 days ago

    Yes. Water consumption has and always will be a dumb ass argument against data centers. There are PLENTY of good reasons, especially power consumption, that it baffles me that the movement hangs on this one.

    • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Interesting I’m of the we have figured the power consumption (technically the issue is now political) issue but the water consumption is a problem. Wanna compare notes? (The noise is a massive huger problem)

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’m not entirely sure, but it seems to me that you claim that the energy consumption issue of datacenters has been solved.

        In what way has it been solved? The only way to solve it is after all by not having AI datacenters consume energy at all, being superflous things and all since: 1. we can easily live without AI datacenters. 2. we desperately need to cut back on energy consumption in every way possible on account of climate change.

        Those factors seem at odds with your (possible) claim that the energy consumption of those centers has been solved.

        • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          We have figured how to create renewable energy, it’s just the politics of today that don’t let its use.

          I don’t agree with your only way to solve it.

          Why do you think renewable energy can’t meet these demands?