• theparadox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Here’s the thing… AI is just a convenient layer of obfuscation. Without the layer, those in power would just do it anyway and still rarely be held accountable.

    While I have mostly negative feelings toward AI and would rather remove any potential layers of obfuscation so that the public can better see the reality firnwhat it is, the powerful need to be held to account directly. Targeting AI for this kind of thing is just a distraction Putting the focus on AI alone is what they’d want.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s true for every type of societal issue. Let’s just assume that for every problem, number one thing that we need to do is eat the rich hold the powerful accountable. But while we figure out how to do that, let’s at least not ignore the actual smaller problem that we’re dealing with.
      A house is on fire because of poor regulations and corruption, poor regulations and corruption needs to be dealt with for sure. A house is on fire though, so it’s also important to deal with.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The main thing is that they want you to keep talking about it. Even if it’s negative press, it’s still press. Just whatever you do…don’t quit talking about it! That’s why I have trouble even making a comment like this. I feel like I’m still feeding into it somehow.

      • theparadox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah. Whether these “AI” bots/systems/agents are doing good or bad things, its usually presented as impressive and/or important and fuels the AI hype train.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think their point is that they were robbing our bank accounts before the robots. Now they’re just blaming the robot for it.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          And my point is that their point is to minimize the bank robbing robots.

          Both things are a problem, the people behind the robots infinitely moreso, but to not minimize the tools of the oppressors. Like blaming the US Gov and ignoring the nuclear bomb.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Tools are tools. If we look at the nuclear bomb, we also see it’s basically the only way to keep the US from invading your country.

      • theparadox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        My inspiration was actually more that the powerful can get away with fucking over the population and blaming it on agents. If the average person used agents to rob a wealthy person, the agents excuse will be worth fuck all.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Powerful can also get away with fucking over the population using said agents* while we all not looking at them doing so.

          *agent is a python script that runs in a loop and asks an llm the endless questions about fucking over the population