• Caesium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    ooh as like a hobby? what’re the cool things u discover? I love handwriting, even tho I don’t make the most legible print >m< but most of what I write is for my own eyes so as long as I can understand it idgaf

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I helped out with an art project once photographing a very old “illuminated manuscript” book so that it could be restored digitally. Literally pouring over thousand year old handwriting to fill in the time-destroyed gaps where letters used to be. It was neat and it permanently altered my brain to be forever interested in interesting handwriting 😅

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Very cool, I’ve had a very similar experience! PS - please take as constructive criticism that it is to pore over, not pour over.

      • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Tsk look at this tryhard over here using his brain to do actually cool and interesting things instead of just feeding invaluable manuscripts into the book-eating machine /s

          • luciferofastora@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I remember the old days when Photoshop required a good deal of professional expertise (way beyond my comprehension) to make something good with it. My mom would diligently magic around with the various colour corrections, that pixel-copying tool to manually and painstakingly excise power lines from beautiful landscape shots and turn a slightly overexposed silhouette against a sunset into a forest line through the precise and careful applications of spells I can only now begin to guess at after a few tentative steps in learning GIMP.

            Today, I imagine it would be a prompt or three to a machine creating a decent, but not exceptional imitation of that work - good enough for professional work where excellence is secondary to efficiency, but hardly interesting for anyone with even a passing interest in photography.

            What I’m trying to say is that being good at Photoshop may well point to a keen eye for details and affinity for diligent work.