• LycanGalen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You’re right that it is the only proof that might appease the masses at this point. That’s what the committee has proposed going forward, too. And I’m feeling a little sour grapes about how the labour I am donating is growing exponentially just to try and outrun GenAI BS.

    • internetisnotthesame@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Then they’ll claim that video of you doing the work is also generated via AI. There’s no way of convincing your regular joe once they made their mind up.

      • lawks@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Though people will claim that, creating very long, consistent, and physically-accurate videos is beyond the capability or budget constraints of publicly available models, for now.

        • internetisnotthesame@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I see your point and would like to add, the issue is, some people are like bricks. Like, you could get a more logical reaction(!) from a brick than these people. You could literally paint something in front of them, and they’d still claim it’s not your own work. Like, there’s no way of proving your innocence/righteousness, no matter what evidence you put in front of them. I can not wrap my head how we can communicate with these people.