• TootSweet@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    In that same Mastodon thread:

    what is the official strategy of KDE regaring “AI”?

    Response from KDE account:

    There isn’t one… yet.

    There is an ongoing discussion started here

    https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/2026-September/124095.html

    David Gerard said “KDE Conf just wants to talk about going full AI slop desktop”.

    So… where’s the inaccuracy (let alone “deceit”) in anything David Gerard said?

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Well, there is a big difference between “someone submitted a talk about going full AI to the KDE conference” and “the KDE conference wants to have a talk about going full AI and this is probably what the leadership wants and is just looking to get rubber stamped”.

      Imagine if someone made a post called “I think the lemmy.world admins should sell out to Meta and make big money” and this was reported as “lemmy.world is debating selling out to Meta; this is probably what the admins wanted to do all along”.

      The core of the matter may be true but the way it’s talked about is anything but accurate.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        the leadership

        David Gerard never said anything about the leadership of KDE. And KDE is “talking” about whether to slop it up or not.