• DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    11 days ago

    A co-worker recently asked which AI I used to make some drawings in a presentation. I made them all by hand in Inkscape, so I’m not sure if I should feel good or bad about the question.

      • ivan@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’m lucky to have colleagues that understand that doing things with AI, that are supposed to reach some audience, will feel low effort to said audience. Like, if I’m tryna sell someone my shit I better not half-ass advertising. Not to mention broken telephone game of me explaining stuff to AI for AI to explain it to potential clientele.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        You should’ve kept the original slide and made sure to give them credit when presenting it: “and before we go to the next slide, I wanted to give a huge thank you to so-and-so for their contribution to this presentation!” *everybody claps*

        • 4grams@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          It was someone in a higher position than I, and I’m 4 months in to the role. So…

      • TheEmpireStrikesDak@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’ve watched my niece and nephews do their homework and since it’s all done online, they literally copypaste the question into chatgpt, then copypaste the answer.

        This is what happens when you ditch pen and paper (there have also been studies showing that handwriting activates different parts of the brain that increases memory retention or something like that, too lazy to look it up). Anyway, we can look forward to gen alpha coworkers not knowing how to do anything if this is how they do their homework.

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    11 days ago

    Time to go back to commissioning portraits from painters who forage to make their own pigments.

  • scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 days ago

    I miss the good honest deception of spending hours trying to make misinformation pieces for fun. Truly, people are too lazy to even hoax authentically anymore, truly a shame.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 days ago

    Really annoys me that people look at old shopped images or CGI videos and go “I think this is AI”.

    I saw someone reposting this video and people were like “oh that’s got to be AI” but no, it’s a Blender video from 2021, guys.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      They seemed to have figured out fingers for the most part, but it’s the empty eyes that freak me out. I can’t express it very well but they all see to have no “focus,” as if they’re staring into the void even though they almost always depict people who are taking part in some sort of activity.

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m old enough to remember when Photoshop became a thing and everyone said it was the end of the world as we know it.

    That we won’t be able to trust images ever again, that people would use it to mass produce misinformation and it would lead to abuse.

    I can’t tell if that was a mad panic or if that’s exactly what happened though.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      I remember that too, except it took actual talent to do so in those days. Back in the days, we had like one or two images the far-right made and claimed to be real. Now we have thousands if not millions.

  • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    wt:retouch

    Verb

    retouch (third-person singular simple present retouches, present participle retouching, simple past and past participle retouched)

    1. (transitive) To improve something (especially a photograph), by adding or correcting details, or by removing flaws.

    a. 1701 (date written), John Dryden, “Epistle the Fourteenth. To Sir Godfrey Kneller, Principal Painter to His Majesty.”, in The Miscellaneous Works of John Dryden, […], volume II, London: […] J[acob] and R[ichard] Tonson, […], published 1760, →OCLC, page 201:

    For time ſhall with his ready pencil ſtand;

    Retouch your figures with his ripening hand;

    Mellow your colors, and imbrown the teint;

    Add every grace, which time alone can grant;

    To future ages ſhall your fame convey,

    And give more beauties than he takes away.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      I remember an article from the 90s that first mentioned ‘computer doctoring’ in terms of photo manipulation. Before Photoshop become well known, the practice was called doctoring.

        • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Airbrushing was one technique. There were others.

          And doctoring is almost as old as photography itself. The Tichborne case in France in the 19th century is one. They had some basic tricks to photographs at the time (most double or partial exposures) but they did count as manipulation.