• Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Sony: we no longer want to support the PC

    PC: we are emulating your hardware now so we don’t care

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      31 minutes ago

      Yeah not too long ago Sony decided to stop porting their games to PC (used to be after a two year delay). I have no idea why. Probably cause Japan hates PC gaming.

      • ogeist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And they hate money and games and Kojima and anything that resembles a business model. You know, because the consultants said so.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I mean no one calls the consultants in when things are going well, so the incentive…

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t know the details, but one of the reasons why the games run so good is that they don’t need to emulate the CPU in its entirety. So the emulator wouldn’t work on anything else than x86, unless the emulator is run with an emulator on top of it (like Fex). But I don’t know to what degree the emulation goes deep. I mean we can install Linux operating system and run the Steam games directly without emulation on the PS5. It is probably something like Wine. But compared to Windows, the environment is pretty clear and users cannot install or replace anything in the system themselves.

      Disclaimer: I don’t know what I’m talking, this is just information fact checked by my gut feeling.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is one of the very few areas that AI is really beneficial to. Probably because it includes a lot of backwards engineering and rewriting instructions for different architectures.

    You know… the kind of manual labour AI was supposed to handle, so that we could focus on more important tasks. And precisely what 99% of actual AI usage isn’t for.

    I’m not very familiar with the project, but their GitHub repo shows Claude as top 3 contributor by commits, and top 11 by additions, so clearly it’s being heavily used.

    If you want to check for yourself:

    • threeonefour@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m not very familiar with the project,

      Neither is anybody else. A codebase entirely written by AI is a codebase nobody is very familiar with.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Of the 200+ commits from the top 3 contributors, 17 are from Claude. 172 are from the project owner. So, ‘entirely written by AI’ is nonsense.

        I mean, sick AI burn and all, but you’re leaping to unsupported conclusions.