Fucking traitorous scum

  • danekrae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    Coming in here and seeing all the bans…

    I know there are two sides to every story. So one shouldn’t just judge from the number of bans, comments upvote ratio, and definitely not by also reading the modlog reasoning…

    • Sonnenblume@discuss.tchncs.deM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      12 days ago

      I see it as keeping at least one part of our community free of the incessant noise of the AI crowd. There are places enough to debate the pros and cons of AI ad nauseam. This community isn’t that place.

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        12 days ago

        Sounds like a really quick way to an echo chamber. That’s not healthy. Also part of why reddit went to shit. There’s nothing wrong with contrasting opinions.

      • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I fucking hate AI and view it as an disgrace to human dignity, but the pro-AI people should be allowed to come here and look like fools of they like (as long as they’re not using AI to write their posts).

        • Sonnenblume@discuss.tchncs.deM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          Well unlike the others who commented you seem to post regularly here. So your opinion is actually worth something. Usually I don’t have to do much in regards to moderation, just the usual spam. Its really only this type of thread where a popular person gets criticised for their AI use and their fan club shows up. Then I try to get ahead of that and kick them out so it doesn’t fester. Free marketplace of ideas is all well and good until one side makes enough noise to drown out every opposing voice and I see the AI side very much as the noisy one.

          • danekrae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            you seem to post regularly here. So your opinion is actually worth something

            Maybe that lovely quote could be in the sidebar of the community? Maybe above the rules that the banned users broke.

          • CovfefeKills@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            I think the problem is the ragebait article designed to appeal to the science deniers that you want to fester here. It’s not hard to be against AI but it is really easy to be stupid about it. And you are all verrryyyy quick to point out someone else being stupid about AI so it is integral you take the L’s when you earn them. And you are definitely earning this one. I mean how can you admit to controlling the narrative by banning people who want to rebut nonsense?

            Everything about this place is just designed to enrage while science is completely ignored and personal opinion and feelings are treated as evidence. You stray from reality and complain about experts making decisions in their field. It’s entirely anti-vaxx magat tier nonsense you are doing this on purpose.

      • danekrae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Cool. I have a feeling what would happen, if someone was to foolish enough to argue against that.

        I’m sure the commenters broke a clearly stated rule that they knew about.