• Hyundai is slowly backing away from the all-screen approach to interior design.
  • Hyundai Design North America Vice President Ha Hak-soo said that people “get stressed, annoyed and steamed when they want to control something in a pinch but are unable to do so.”
  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Hyundai is listening to what consumers want much more readily than other manufacturers, and their body designs strike an incredible balance between modern familiarity and retrofuturism. It’s almost exactly what I want from a new vehicle, other than the fact that they use all the same forced telemetry that other brands are using.

    They’re also offering a great spread of electric AND hybrid vehicles to satisfy consumers worried about charger availability as well as consumers worried about the impact of gasoline-powered vehicles.

    I won’t be surprised if they continue to increase their market share for a long time to come. If only privacy concerns were as common among the broader population as they seem to be here in the Fediverse, then maybe they might address those issues as well and be a no-brainer purchase.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Design is science, they fail and go back. Doing the same thing over and over again hoping for a different outcome is the definition of insanity… Oh wait.

    • jayandp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty much. Give me a screen for Android Auto so I can interact with my preferred navigation and media apps, and then just let me control the car.

      Like, if you want to add a menu for low-level tweaking of stuff I don’t need(or shouldn’t change) while driving, sure(like suspension settings). But for everything else, AC, seat warmers, forward/reverse, windshield wipers, headlights, etc, I want a button or knob.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    299
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good. This should be forced via regulations. Touchscreen controls are provably more dangerous than buttons due to the distraction.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Haptic feedback like knob clicks or button presses are much easier to use without taking eyes off the road as often.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        111
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Shhh, don’t call it “haptic feedback” or they might make them flat, unmoving buttons that have a vibration motor behind them.

      • SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Don’t you still have to look at it to find it first? Edit: sorry i thought you were talking about touch screens

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          No. All the knobs are in roughly the same area, so you can find and manipulate them by touch without looking.

          • errer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            3 days ago

            I regularly manipulate my 2008 Toyota matrix’s radio and HVAC controls while never taking my eyes off the road. I won’t buy any car that forgoes the physical controls.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Even if you have to look at it first, once on it you can go by feel where as i find i struggle to do the same on a fully touch control.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m sure Trump and his new auto industry advisor, Elon Musk, will get right on that. 😔

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    Absolutely my creed. In my industrial niche, touch screen never took hold - when your action is actually (or at least perceived) important, nobody wants to rely on touch screens.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not having touch anything is a selling point for me. Bonus points if I can roll up the window too.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Personally I prefer a mixture of both. Touch screen for anything you don’t need to operate while driving and physical for everything else.

      Android Auto navigation, car system/audio settings, clock and system management, etc should all be a touch screen so you aren’t navigating through turning knobs and pressing up and down buttons to go through various menus like your programming a microwave.

      Knobs and dials and buttons for anything to do with audio volume, skip/reverse tracks, etc. and air conditioning.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      Automakers will read this comment and think that everyone wants voice control instead of touchscreens or buttons.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        Just to be completely clear then (and I’m sorry for yelling):

        WE DON’T WANT VOICE CONTROL IN OUR CARS. AND IF YOU ADD AI WE’LL BURN YOU TO THE FUCKING GROUND.

      • ziggurat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Please unlock the door

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app

        Open the door

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app

        Ooopen theeee dooooor

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app

        Unlock the door

        Turning on cabin warmer

        The door unlock it

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app

        Open the door!

        Voice can not be authenticated please run calibration in the phone app

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        My Prius has a voice control option built in already. The only time I’ve ever activated it is by accident because it’s a steering wheel button. It’s a 2016 Prius so I doubt it’s able to do a whole lot anyway. Thankfully, most of the controls do not require the touch screen or voice control. None of the essential ones do.

  • doktormerlin@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just got a new Hyundai and I think they already have the perfect amount of touch vs buttons. Everything you need to access has buttons, the things which would be too annoying to do during the drive are touch

  • pinkystew@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    The bathrooms in hell all have automatic sinks where you can’t tell where the sensor is and an inconsistent delay.

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was in an airport bathroom and somehow the auto soap dispenser managed to squirt soap into my open cup of coffee. Fuck those things.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have questions about why you’d take an open cup of coffee into a public bathroom.

          • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Tbf they only complain about the removing your pants part. Keep your pants up, and you can take a shit there before they complain about the smell.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was one of those one person family bathrooms. I had a 3 hour wait and a bottle of rum.

        • Baggins@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Exactly, where was the coffee whilst the poster was using the toilet?

          There’s a nasty little goblin of a bloke where I work. Toilets for all offices on the floor. He takes phone AND coffee. Splashes everywhere, doesn’t flush.

          I’d like to flush him instead.

      • Darth_Mew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        this is disgusting I’d rather have soap in my coffee then take an open cup into the bathroom. I’d say that the dispenser is justified in its actions

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly. I’d be fine with a touchscreen for things you wouldn’t likely be adjusting on the go anyways - but basic stuff like the radio and AC/Fans should always be easy to distinguish, don’t need to look away from the road to operate buttons. Making basic stuff require touchscreen is inconvenient at best and outright dangerous at worst.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Give me a manageable handful of physical buttons with defaults but that I can customize. The pendulum swung too far. There is a Place for touch screens and buttons in cars. They can live in Harmony. Personally, I never want to see a climate control physical button except maybe for my passengers microclimates. I set a setpoint and set the fan to auto like I do in my house. Let the car adjust to the preferred setpoint. Heated seats / heated steering wheel? Programmed parameters. Stereo controls? Hell yeah, let’s get tactile - don’t make me look at anything for that. I don’t mind the idea of voice controls too, but I’ve never met one in a car that wasn’t frustrating AF. Prefer to leave that out until the tech improves.

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Conversely, I want the ac controls on physical buttons because when I’m in driving and am in direct sunlight, or when I’ve just jumped in the car after doing some heavy work, I want ice cold Antarctic air blowing on my face. The ambient temperature of the general cabin is irrelevant to me. I do not want to be hunting around through menus to find the ac fan control slider.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not opposed to a big Max AC button. Use it rarely because the car usually knows to crank it up, but sometimes I agree this button is nice.

          • 5in1k@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t want my car to know anything. I want it to do what I say and only what I say without question. I’m thinking of getting a 70’s truck.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        My wife’s Ford Edge has the worst of both worlds. It has buttons for the stereo and AC but they’re all flat capacitive buttons so they barely work when you touch them and you still have to take your eyes off the road to find them.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I recently got a Kia Niro and it has buttons on the wheel for most of the basic functions of the touch screen. Really handy

      • Baggins@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes same here. Still reach for the volume control occasionally though. Moving up and down the cruise control and what have you is a bit fiddly as well, so I usually don’t bother.

    • apemint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have a UFO Civic and, out of all the cars I’ve been in, it has hands down the best dashboard. Everything is tactile and arranged in a way that I don’t have to look away from the road to adjust anything.

      Beyond tactile vs. touchscreen, I wish more manufacturers payed attention to ergonomics so I wouldn’t have to reach into my ass to find the AC or the defogging button.

    • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Personally I don’t even need that, just give me aux and usb ports for my phone. It’ll be multitudes better than whatever hardware they use for the “infotainment” system.

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 days ago

        I would rather have just a dumb display with an open standard that will mirror my phone and send touches back. Android auto is great but it’s a proprietary protocol that support could be dropped at any time. Same with apple. Everything that is not infotainment should be physical buttons so if I want to swap out my display for something else it won’t neuter my hvac

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          There should be the mandatory inclusion of a set of open APIs that pass info like:

          • display and audio signal (duh)

          • microphone audio (to pass voice commands)

          • whether the headlights are on (to offer auto dark mode switching on the display)

          • whether the handbrake is engaged (so things like video playback can be a parked-only feature)

          • crash sensor activation (so that a phone could, if the user desires, automatically alert emergency services)

          • For EVs, battery SoC (so that navigation software can include charging stops seamlessly)

          • whether the car is left-hand-drive or right-hand-drive (so on-screen buttons can always be close to the driver, not on the wrong side)

          From there on, there can be actual competition in the space. You’re not just limited to Android Auto or Apple CarPlay. Any app would be able to use this API data.

          • The Pantser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Agreed, The left/right hand drive is a hidden setting in AA too. I found it and was happy to be able to have my media controls on the other side because I use them more than navigation. I set my destination and go, I change my podcast more.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        After rolling to CarPlay and Android auto for a while, I’d rather not use a tiny handheld UI when I drive. iOS and Android’s auto UIs have bigger buttons and are more glanceable. If I’m using a screen while driving, I’d rather the screen that was designed for peripheral vision and less precise button targeting.

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        As someone who needs GPS a lot for work, having it on the large display is very nice. I think the sweet spot is around 7 inches; big enough for maps, but leave enough space for everything else.

        The best is when they display the “next step” right on the dash. Too bad my work vehicle doesn’t do that.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          The downside of building the phone/tablet into the car, though, is that phones change more quickly than cars.

          A 20 year old car can be perfectly functional. A 20 year old smarphone is insanely outdated. If the phone is built into the car, you’re stuck with it.

          Relative to a built-in system, I’d kind of rather just have a standard mounting point with security attachments and have the car computer be upgraded. 3DIN maybe.

          I get the “phone is small” argument, but the phone is upgradeable.

          And I’d definitely rather have physical controls for a lot of things.

          • clgoh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s why Car Play/Android Auto is the best way to go. The smarts are in the phone, but you can have a bigger display.

            • Jesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Exactly. These systems have been around for a decade and my new phone still works on an old Alpine CarPlay head unit from 2014.

              Base alpine software may feel dated, but once the phone is in, I get the modern version of all my mapping, listening, and communication software.

              Projection systems rock. I was an early adopter and I refuse to go back. Docking a phone on an air vent is janky.

              • clgoh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Sadly, I still have an older car without Car Play/Android Auto.

                • Jesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Have you thought about upgrading to an aftermarket stereo or a one of those CarPlay / aa units that connects to your car’s existing auto inputs? I had CarPlay in a 2001 Subaru.

          • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            A 20 year old car can be perfectly functional.

            Not if the car manufacturers get their wish. They’d love to force you to buy a new car every few years. Having tech installed that becomes obsolete fast would help make you upgrade.

          • Jesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, but most manufacturers support CarPlay and Android Auto these days. Your car’s dashboard experience inherits whatever your phone’s OS projection system sends.

            My old car’s onboard infotainment may be a decade behind, but when I plug my phone in, it’s 2024.

        • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The best is when they display the “next step” right on the dash.

          Ahhh that sounds awesome!

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I have a pre-touchscreen era (for its model anyway) 2012 car. I’m hoping by the time I have to get a new car this touchscreen fad will have come and gone. How are you supposed to use those things in the winter when you have gloves on?

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most newer touch panels work pretty well with gloves but they do make gloves that are compatible with touch panels.

    • xpinchx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s a happy medium. I have a slightly newer VW GTI (2017) with a touchscreen but there are still buttons and dials for basically everything. It’s a perfect infotainment system if you ask me :)