• vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I got into a car crash and went to the ER to get an X-ray done to make sure nothing was off, not this was a week after the crash. Anyways hurt like a bitch and after awhile of waiting the X-ray gets done and the tech just kinda looks at it for a minute, turns to me and says “Two bits of good news, your knee is just inflamed and swollen no breaks, also Ive been doing this for awhile and your bone density is absurd” which is how I found out that I’m a freak of nature who has borderline unbreakable bones. Explains why I struggle to swim in fresh water so much.

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “Do you want the good news or the bad news first?”

    “The good news”

    “We’re going to name the disease after you”

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “Well, then what’s the bad news?”

      “We’re going to name the disease after you”

    • UnequalExchange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      “… limb lengthening surgery side effect may include missing bones , desire to reverse the surgery,… death… and other terrible things. Results may vary. No batteries included . No refunds guaranteed. Ask your doctor today.”

      🌟🌟 Happy Go Lucky music continues to play in the bacckground 👯💃

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          That’s not what this is. That hardware is to set a bone, and those bone lengthy rigs are more complex.

          Most likely scenario is either the bone was shattered enough that repair wasn’t possible, or it was used for a bone graft. The fibula is a common bone that’s used because it’s not very load bearing.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Back in school went to the school clinic for strep throat, and upon listening to my heart, he said “just a moment”, then pulled in the med student and quizzed them on what they were hearing and how it was abnormal.

      Which led to a follow up echocardiogram where the technician was explaining everything we were looking at and what it was, until a very specific view then she shut up, tapped a bunch of things on the device, printed out something, then moved to another view and resumed describing everything except what she just saw.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Oh the tech wasn’t allowed to discuss medically relevant stuff.

          The doctor followed up and I have an essentially benign heart anomaly. Growing up first doctors didn’t think it was worth exploring, then doctors said it went away, that was my first visit to a doctor after moving to a bigger city and those doctors were shocked a doctor would say it went away and not even bother to image it before dismissing it.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      My eye doctor did that on one of my recent visits. Apparently my astigmatism is exceptional…

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        A little better, at least then it’s something the doctor likely understands, but thinks it is at least a bit of a teachable situation.

        If they call in a peer or superior, then it means something was over their depth and then you really worry.

      • ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The students just want to see freaky stuff. E. g. my appendix ruptured when I was 15 and it took my mother a few days to realize I’m not faking. So I have a bunch of scars, some parts are missing and other’s just look a bit off. Nothing I don’t know or can’t live with.

        But when they call their fully grown colleagues to look at THAT. That’s creepy. That’s not good.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’d say yes. If it’s regular rare it’s interesting for the younglings, if its extra rare it’s interesting even for the experienced.

  • raspirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    197
    ·
    1 day ago

    One time I was in the ER, and a doctor noted that my heart beat has a rather pronounced split s2 rythm which is something that doctors need to learn to discern when listening to a heartbeat, so for the next hour as I was waiting around, I had several other younger physicians stop by and say “hey I was told to come listen to your heartbeat.”

    Made me feel a little special in a very peculiar way I haven’t known since.

    • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      A girlfriend’s father had a condition where his organs were mirrored to the opposite side of the body and his circulatory system ran backwards (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situs_inversus)

      Him and his family doctor loved bringing new coworkers in to do a “liver check” or something like that, and watch the person probe around with their hand and slowly get confused, then kind of freak out, when they couldn’t find organs in the body.

      They did it for many years and both thought it was hilarious.

    • mrmisses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Couldn’t they just, you know, simulate it on a computer? Or listen to a recording? I guess it’s possible you’re very old.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Not a doctor, but am in various situations where I have to pick sounds out. There’s something very valuable about having a natural example, especially if the person listening has to find that example all on their own.

        • mrmisses@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          They were told they should listen to the heartbeat. Also I’ve worked at several colleges, I’ve seen what they train with - it’s very impressive. They can definitely simulate it today

  • Murse@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    1 day ago

    Um… so looking at the tibia, that is 100% an intramedullary tibial nail:

    …which means their tibia was broken as fuck, and there’s a pretty hefty chance the fibula was also broken as fuck in that same injury.

    My guess is the missing segment was fragmented to the point of not being saveable, and removed during the same operation the IM nail was placed.

    That doesn’t necessarily mean the OP is bullshit - maybe they had some new resident docs, or nurses, or techs or w/e who hadn’t seen that before and it was a genuine wtf moment for them. I love it when new staff get that look!

      • Murse@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Huh. I’ve only ever seen that word in the context of anatomy, but I guess it also belongs to the cores of trees. TIL.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not an issue, and pretty easily as it’s not a major weight bearing structure. It mostly functions as an attachment point for various muscles and as A part of the articulation of the ankle joint. Part of it is commonly harvested for use as a bone graft.

        The most commonly harvested area starts right at the top of where the missing section begins, so I suspect this post may be bullshit.

        • Aeao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t know horses get pretty screwed when they break a leg even with the best medical technology at the owners disposal.

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 day ago

            To be fair to horses, their legs are fingers, which doesn’t help the problem.

            • ChogChog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m imagining sports would be a lot more brutal if once a player got injured, they send out “the vet” onto the field to destroy them if they got any broken fingers or toes.

          • Murse@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Is that like non-functional doomed, or like we can’t use them for sport any more so we opt to kill them doomed? I’ve heard the spiel about horses breaking a leg before, but I’m not actually sure what it’s supposed to imply.

            • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s doomed as in they’ll die with most bad leg injuries. Horses cant support themselves on 3 legs. They’re just too big. There was a foal with 3 legs that lived for a couple years and made its round on social media, but it was eventually put down because it just grew too large. Poor thing should have been put down immediately because the life it lived was of terrible quality despite getting specialized care.

              I’ve seen a few horses get put down for a bad leg injury. Almost had to put down my childhood mare after she fucked up her leg in a fence. She made a full recovery, but it took almost a year for it to heal. Her leg got caught in the wire fence and it got shredded to the bone. It was awful, but she was able to stand on it enough to keep herself upright and all that, so we decided to try to get it healed and were miraculously successful

              • Murse@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                16 hours ago

                That’s actually weirdly comforting. I always thought it was a comment on how quick humans are to just dispose of our companions once they start needing care.

                And on that note, excellent work for NOT doing that and taking care of your hooved friend! ^_^

                • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  I mean there are pretty ruthless horse people, but not many are like that. Everyone I know goes above and beyond for their horses. My mare was considered a lost cause by many when I met her two years ago. I spent those two years rehabbing her and becoming her bestie and now she’s in incredible shape physically and mentally. 10/10 worth the effort. I’ll probably only get a couple more years with her because she’s very old, but she living an exceptionally wonderful life now and that’s all that matters to me. I want her to have the best old age she can. She’s had a hard life and deserves to live out the rest of her days in comfort and happiness

      • Murse@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        To be clear, othopedics is not my area of expertise,

        edit - ortho specialty chimed in. Sounds like it’s responsible for much less than I understood - see the next comment in the chain.

        so grain of salt, but to my understanding, it’s basically the radius bone, but of the leg. Aim your toes forward in the normal anatomical position; now rotate your entire foot to the left or right. That’s your fibula working. Without it, very limited rotation; but otherwise you can still walk and function mostly normally, just a bit impaired.

        I have no idea how ‘chunk missing in the middle’ plays into that. Guessing you’d still have some rotation, but without a secure anchor point, it wouldn’t be great.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Aim your toes forward in the normal anatomical position; now rotate your entire foot to the left or right. That’s your fibula working. Without it, very limited rotation; but otherwise you can still walk and function mostly normally, just a bit impaired

          Eh… I do specialize in orthopedics and rehabilitation. You can still do all these things without a fully functional fibula, just to a reduced degree. The fibula only contributes to a few degrees of range of motion in the lower limb, we are talking about millimeters. It can be noticeable given enough time or a high enough level of vigorous activity. Most people would live a fairly active lifestyle without noticing this kind of damage to the fibula.

          • Murse@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            we are talking about millimeters

            No shit? I would have guessed at least like 15 degrees of rotation. I think I took the radius comparison a bit too literal.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              The radius moves a lot more than the fibula, which makes sense considering the need for moderate rigidity for weight bearing. The fibula only moves around a degree in internal and external rotation and less than a degree in the sagital tilting.

              If you think about the rom in the ankle compared to the wrist it makes a bit more sense.

              • Murse@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Yeah I wasn’t thinking ankle at all. And even here and now, I’m trying to rotate my own leg while keeping the ankle rigid, and… yea it doesn’t go very far. Never really appreciated just how large a role the ankle plays there.

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Yeah, it’s the only weight bearing compound triplanar joint in the body. So it’s a lot more complex than something like the ball and socket joint of your hip. That’s why ankle and foot surgeries face a lot more complications and need for revisions compared to most other orthopedic operations.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              You’d probably eventually notice just after a long time if you are fairly active, even a loss of rom of a couple degrees adds up over time. You would probably notice a lot faster if you were an athlete, just because the issues would compound faster and you’re more connected to your body.

      • DeadDigger@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It basically depends why it’s missing. In general it is not a problem if it is removed after an injury but it can lead to knee problems. However if you have a trauma that warrants a removal you will have very likely knee problems anyway.

        If you are missing part of it from birth it is a big problem, because it is usually a sign of Fibular hemimelia and then you will most likely get an amputation

      • myyass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Muscle contractions and spasms will be indistinguishable between pain or pleasure. Just kidding, it will hellish if you get dehydrated and get muscle spasms. You don’t need it. Source, got a rod myself.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably just an atrophic nonunion fracture. If it was that damaged and you were already doing a tibial nail, there wouldn’t really be a reason not to do a fibular nail at the same time.

      The fibula has fairly poor blood flow compared to the tibia, it’s not really that rare for the fracture to never callus and bridge back together. If that happens a lot of the times the bone will be subject to resorption.

      • Murse@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If it was that damaged and you were already doing a tibial nail, there wouldn’t really be a reason not to do a fibular nail at the same time.

        Yeah… supply issue maybe? Or patient opted out due to cost?

        /shrug

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Supply issues aren’t really an issue, orthopedic operations like this aren’t exactly emergent care. If you have time to procure a tibial nail there isn’t a reason you wouldn’t be able to get a fibular nail at the same time.

          As far as cost, the same logic applies. When an orthopedist is coming up with a treatment plan you submit the treatment plan that would best lead to the overall best outcome for the patient, you don’t really formulate based on the most economic outcome.

          The insurance company isn’t going to deny a fibular nail, but approve a tibial one. If they are going to go out of pocket, the cost of the fibular nail would be negligible when compared to the overall cost of the operation. The most expensive aspect of an orthopedic moderation is the operating room and the anesthesia, not the additional hardware or operating time.

          • Murse@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Just spitballing. Consent issue maybe? Like it only covered tibia, and the staff didn’t notice until the patient was under / couldn’t get a hold of family to have it added?

            How quickly can it absorb?

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              That’s not really how consent works, at least not in the US. You typically give consent for the operation, not for every individual procedure that’s done in the operation. A lot of the times you don’t really know what’s going to be needed to be done until you have the patient opened up, so the provider has a lot of leeway to operate as they see fit.

              How quickly can it absorb?

              Depends on the individual and what bone we are talking about. Though that’s quite a lot of bone to dissipate, so my guess would be that it’s a fairly old injury.

              • Murse@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                From what I’ve seen in the US, it varies a lot from one facility to another. For surgery, most of what I’ve seen the consents address the expected operation “and all other indicated procedures” that give the surgeon the discretion to add something on intraoperatively if it’s justified. That said, the facility I’m at now decidedly does NOT do that. They can add an operation on if it’s an emergency, but something like a fibular nail would require specific consent. …which they should have ahead of time, cuz imaging would make the need for one pretty obvious, but dumb shit happens and things get missed… So fast forward to the operation, patient is under, skin is cut, and circulator points out “uh, hey we only have consent for tibia…” If they have a family member available who can make decisions on the patient’s behalf, that person could give consent, but if not they’d probably just skip it and schedule it as a later surgery.

                …shit can get goofy.

    • UnequalExchange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      As a person who has successfully stolen shit from Detroit? I dont think youre correct.

      PS : Detroitians. Please lay off the deep dish pizza. AND eat more fibre please!

  • clucose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They didn‘t put everything back after the operation. That’s how I end up with random screws after any repair I do.

      • clucose@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        1 day ago

        They try to use it in the next operation. Somebody out there with mismatched bones. One leg longer than the other.

      • Murse@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Doctors would do no such thing!

        …they’d actually just waltz around the hospital with whatever fell onto the OR floor still stuck to their shoe, tracking chunks of it all over the fucking place until some some crusty 70 y/o nurse chews him out while swatting him with today’s word search from the news paper.

        Pretty routine stuff, really.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It probably was not recoverable when they repaired whatever made that Titanium splint and screws neccesary.

    Edit: apparently the middle portion of the fibula is so non-essential for weight-bearing that it is the most common bone harvested for bone grafts elsewhere in the body

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not necessarily, it could be a group of people who weren’t aware of removing the bone being a thing, but it’s probably a lie for internet points.

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ah, I guess I assumed “everyone” referred to medical professionals involved in the treatment, and that if there was an explanation OOP knew that it would have been included, but I can see how it’s possible

      • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Based on what I read after, given the injury to the Tibia, Mabe the Fibula’s middle was sacrificed for a bone graft, rather than cutting open his good leg as well.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Doesn’t really look like it’s been taken out for a graft, at least not anytime recently. My bet would be he acquired a atrophic nonunion fracture the same time he broke his tibia. The rounded edges of the bone look more like they’ve been subject to resorption instead of being excised.

          Honestly not that rare for fibular fractures, though the segment missing is fairly large. So it’s probably a fairly old injury.

          • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I suspect an older harvest. The callus combined with some perimeter resorption tends to lead to a conical profile. Sometimes the callus will even hypertrophy and make a couple of little drumsticks.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s a possibility, but I doubt it considering the profile pic seems to be of a relatively young patient. Plus, I’m not seeing anywhere on the tibia where a graft would be necessary, of course it could have been utilized elsewhere.

              It would also be an odd place to harvest from, usually you would shoot for an area a little more distal to the attachment point of the extensor hallucis longus.

  • Kevin77@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I have the same nail in my tibia. I Also fractured my fibula and they said that they don’t normally do much for a fibula break.