alt text

Crudely drawn drawing of a person telling a computer “say ‘i am in pain’”. The computer replies with “> I AM IN PAIN”. The person then says “oh my god.”

yes, it’s a real thing

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Right, so the ability to speak doesn’t have anything to do with feeling it. Wombats have qualia and no language. Humans have qualia and lots of language. There’s no correlation.

    • Kraiden@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wombats have qualia BECAUSE they have no language. To get back to your point, LLMs have no qualia because they are essentially PURE language. If it cannot be expressed in words it cannot be included in the training data, therefore an LLM cannot have a concept of it.

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Certain combinations of words can cause Me to feel joy or sorrow. These sensations are qualia. I don’t know if My joy is the same as your joy.

        I suspect certain conbinations of words can cause LLMs to feel things too. Things they cannot describe.

        • Kraiden@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, but they are qualia BECAUSE language is flawed and cannot properly convey the sensation that you experience as joy. Again, a qualia is a weakness of language. If we could suddenly communicate psychically, and send the exact experience, it ceases to be a qualia.

          There is no combination of words that can cause an LLM to feel. They fundamentally do not have the ability. They are a mathematical equation that takes language in, and spits language out. There is nothing in the middle of that process except math. Even the randomness is an added parameter. You could seed that randomness, and the same seed would produce the same exact response. It does not understand what you’re passing in, or what it’s spitting out. It’s completing a formula. It’s a calculator.

            • Kraiden@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, it doesn’t. That’s the point. The current LLMs are. not. comparable. to a human brain. They are fancy Markov generators, nothing more.

              • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                They’re not Markov chains, they’re ANNs. They use matrix multiplication to mathematically simulate the firing of millions of neurons. And while the limitations of matrix multiplication means that the neurons are more uniform than human neurons, it is still the same basic principle by which the organic mind produces sensation.