cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/50292078

Crossposted from https://lemmy.world/post/50292024

“Today is August 4, 2026”

Text transcript available at the bottom

Transcript

There Will Come Soft Rains

By: Ray Bradbury

In the living room the voice-clock sang, Tick-tock, seven o’clock, time to get up, time to get up, seven o’clock! As if it were afraid that nobody would.

Seven-nine, breakfast time, seven-nine!

In the kitchen the breakfast stove ejected eight pieces of perfectly browned toast, eight eggs sunnyside up, sixteen slices of bacon, two coffees, and two cool glasses of milk.

“Today is August 4, 2026, the city of Allendale, California.”

Somewhere in the walls, relays clicked, memory tapes glided under electric eyes.

“”Eight-one, tick-tock, eight-one o’clock, off to school, off to work, run, run, eight-one!” But no doors slammed. It was raining outside. The weather box on the front door sang quietly: “Rain, rain, go away; rubbers, raincoats for today…”

Outside, the garage chimed and lifted its door to reveal the waiting car.

After a long wait the door swung down again.

At eight-thirty the eggs were shriveled and the toast was like stone. An aluminum wedge scraped them into the sink. The dirty dishes were dropped into a hot washer and emerged twinkling dry.

“Nine-fifteen,” sang the clock, “time to clean.”

Tiny robot mice thudded against chairs, whirling their mustached runners, Kneading the rug nap, sucking gently at hidden dust. Then, they popped into their burrows. The house was clean.

“Ten o’clock.” The sun came out from behind the rain. The house stood alone in a city of rubble and ashes. This was the one house left standing. At night the ruined city gave off a radioactive glow which could be seen for miles.

“Ten-fifteen.” The garden sprinklers pelted the windowpanes,

running down the charred west side where the house had been burned evenly

free of its white paint. The entire west face of the house was black, save for five places. Here the silhouette in paint of a man mowing a lawn. Here, as in a photograph, a woman bent to pick flowers. Still farther over, their images burned on wood in one titanic instant, a small boy, hands flung into the air; higher up, the image of a thrown ball, and opposite him a girl, hand raised to catch a ball which never came down.

The five spots of paint – the man, the woman, the children, the ball –

remained. The rest was a think charcoaled layer.

“Twelve noon.”

A dog whined on the front porch.

The front door recognized the dog voice and opened. The dog, once huge and fleshy, but now gone to bone and covered with sores, moved in and through the house, tracking mud.

The dog frothed at the mouth, ran wildly in circles, biting at its tail, spun in a frenzy, and died. It lay in the parlor for an hour.

“Two-fifteen.”

The dog was gone.

In the cellar, the incinerator glowed suddenly and a whirl of sparks leaped up the chimney.

“Two thirty-five.”

Bridge tables sprouted from patio walls. Playing cards fluttered. Martinis manifested while music played.

But the tables were silent and the cards untouched.

At four o’clock the tables folded back through the paneled walls. “Four-thirty.”

The nursery walls glowed.

Animals took shape: yellow giraffes, blue lions, pink antelopes, lilac panthers. Hidden films clocked through well-oiled sprockets, and the glas walls lived. It was the children’s hour.

“Six, seven, eight o’clock.” The dinner dishes manipulated like magic

tricks, and in the study a click.

“Nine-five.” A voice spoke from the study ceiling:

“Mrs. McClellan, which poem would you like this evening?”

The house was silent.

The voice said at last, “Since you express no preference, I shall select a

poem at random.” “Sara Teasdale. As I recall, your favorite…

“There will come soft rains and the smell of the ground,

And swallows circling with their shimmering sound;

And frogs in the pools singing at night, And wild plum trees in tremulous white;

Robins will wear their feathery fire, Whistling their whims on a low fence-wire;

And not one will know of the war, not one Will care at last when it is done,

Not one would mind, neither bird nor tree If mankind perished utterly;

And Spring herself, when she woke at dawn Would scarcely know that we were gone.

At ten o’clock a falling tree bough crashed through the kitchen window

shattering cleaning solvent over the stove. The room was ablaze in an instant.

“Fire!” screamed a voice. Water pumps shot water from the ceilings while the voices took it up in chorus: “Fire, fire, fire!”

The house tried to save itself, but the wind blew and sucked upon the fire.

Scurrying water rats pistoled their water, and ran for more. And the wall sprays let down showers of mechanical rain.

But too late. The quenching rain ceased. The reserve water supply which had filled baths and washed dishes for many quiet days was gone.

From attic trapdoors gushed a green chemical.

But the fire was clever. It had sent flames outside the house, up through The attic to the pumps there. An explosion! The attic brain which directed the pumps was shattered.

The house shuddered, its bared skeleton cringing from the heat. And the voices wailed, “Fire, fire, run, run,” like a tragic nursery rhyme, a dozen voices, high, low. One, two, three, four, five voices died.

Other choruses could be heard announcing the time, playing music, or cutting the lawn by remote-control mower. A scene of maniac confusion, yet unity; singing, screaming, and one voice, read poetry aloud in the firey study, until all the film spools burned.

In the kitchen the stove could be seen making breakfasts at a psychopathic rate, ten dozen eggs, six loaves of toast, twenty dozen bacon strips, which eaten by the fire, started the stove working again, hysterically hissing!

The crash. The attic smashing into kitchen and parlor. The parlor into cellar, cellar into sub-cellar.

Smoke and silence.

Among the ruins, one wall stood alone. Within the wall, a last voice said,

over and over, “Today is August 5, 2026, today is August 5, 2026, today is …”

    • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The second I saw Cyrillic with English subtitles I knew I was either in for a trip or something surprisingly beautiful and surreal animation wise. I swear, Eastern block animation was its own beast, with such beautiful looking, yet dread causing, animations like this.

    • wildflower@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I see this as a possible dystopian future of the human race, a future where nothing of value is left, only thing that is left is the simile of life, and if our current models of AI is the only thing to survive, we might as well not have been here at all, every truth and fact will be torn apart by hallucinating machines…

      but then again, art is subjective.

      • OmegaMouse@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        In what way is it about the dangers of AI though? If anything, it’s about the dangers of nuclear war with the backdrop of a smart home falling apart

          • ZDL@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Uh… re-read it.

            The garden sprinklers pelted the windowpanes, running down the charred west side where the house had been burned evenly free of its white paint. The entire west face of the house was black, save for five places. Here the silhouette in paint of a man mowing a lawn. Here, as in a photograph, a woman bent to pick flowers. Still farther over, their images burned on wood in one titanic instant, a small boy, hands flung into the air; higher up, the image of a thrown ball, and opposite him a girl, hand raised to catch a ball which never came down. The five spots of paint – the man, the woman, the children, the ball – remained. The rest was a think charcoaled layer.

            This is a nuclear shadow story, not an AI/automation disaster one.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              This is true, but it can be both, especially if you read it with Fahrenheit 451 in mind, where technology is clearly having a detrimental effect on peoples empathy. And the ability to think for yourself is oppressed. Which is why books are banned.

                • T156@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  If anything, it’s a bit of a sad story about automated conveniences continuing their task after the people using them are long dead.

                  Every morning, the house would continue to greet the dead to a morning they will never see, opening the doors to allow passage for a car forever left undriven, readied for a work commute that they can no longer take.

                • Alloi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  much like every piece of art, there is room for interpretation, and each new interpretation breathes new meaning, even if unintended by the creator. someone obviously read this, connected the dots for it to also mean AI or unchecked automation was responsible for the obivous nuclear war. which was the original message. one can only assume the cause of the nukes flying, but due to the heavy focus on the houses automation. it can also be considered or assumed that perhaps maybe that automation stretched further than the home itself. perhaps since everything in the home was automated, then maybe OTHER things were automated as well. like nuclear control. nuclear war is the result of the absence of human empathy, and machines dont have empathy. so it can be be a potential reality where in this automated world, that they automated war as well. much like we do today.

                  and so, both interpretations now exist in the world.

                  and that may frustrate you, or upset you, or piss you off, or go against your line of thinking. but the existence of the interpretation makes it real. maybe not to you, but to others. and thats okay.

                  its a part of human nature, and cultural evolution. we apply stories from the past to the happenings of the now. like 1984. it was written about totalitarianism. but generally many people with a surface level understanding use it as an example of a communist dystopia. to them, communism bad. full stop. but in its words its stretches much farther than its main themes and plots.

                  subtext, subplots. the intended or uninteded interpretations of the reader are things every author understands are inevitable. as should every reader.

                  if this wasnt the case then there wouldnt be dozens or hundreds of variations and sects of religious doctrines born from the bible, quran, torrah, etc. but there is.

                  different times, different meanings, different interpretations. some more agreeable, some violently opposable.

                  im not agreeing or disagreeing, i am merely sondering between the many view points that exist here,and playing the advocate for a line of thinking that may expand your own, or not.

                  who knows.

                • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  It most definitely was when it was written, but to me it’s a story about the obsession for idyllic automation (or more broadly, “progress” in the individualistic sense) while ignoring real dangers. Back then it was nuclear war, but today it could be climate change, fascism, AGI, or whatever else

          • OmegaMouse@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Hmm my take on it is that nuclear war has taken place, and it’s about how the house tragically keeps performing its duties not knowing that the human inhabitants are long dead.

            And yes, automated tech exists in the world of this story but I don’t see that as ‘AI’ any more than I’d view a teasmade (a kettle with a timer) as AI.

            For the sake of argument say that the story did include some form of AI. I think AI in science fiction is actually quite interesting (especially stuff from several decades back) because it tends to have some nuance, and isn’t the crappy LLM stuff that we’re getting in real life. My understanding is that this community is more about how shitty LLMs are.

            *edit - I think you updated your post to mention Skynet just after I responded, and that’s exactly my point. That’s an example of an ACTUALLY COOL concept of AI, and I think most people like those films

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Synopsis by Google about Ray Bradbury on AI:

      The Danger of Complacency: Works like Fahrenheit 451 and “There Will Come Soft Rains” warned against letting screens, automation, and convenience erode human agency, deep reading, and genuine emotional empathy

      Edit:
      if you read it with Fahrenheit 451 in mind, where technology is clearly having a detrimental effect on peoples empathy. And the ability to think for yourself is oppressed. Which is why books are banned. This is clearly a general result of technology humanity can not control.

      Today that image is very much about AI, where for Ray Bradbury that idea was more abstract, but he clearly desccibes machines that to some degree are thinking, and in Fahrenheit 451 clearly to the degree where humanity is controlled by the technology instead of humanity controlling the technology.

      Regarding my original response being formulated by an LLM, I believe there are situations where they do a decent job.
      Which I thought it did in this case.

      I’m absolutely against AI being used to create for instance AI slob, or creating reports for government decision makers. But for banal tasks they can do a decent job IMO, and having read Ray Bradbury, my original post absolutely reflects what my own interpretation very closely.

      You may consider it lazy, but it isn’t wrong.

      Edit 2.
      To all those that claim this is just another nuclear Armageddon story, what then is the purpose of describing a highly automated society, that keeps running after the people are dead?
      People here apparently wouldn’t be able to see an elephant if it stood right in front of them, because it doesn’t fit their prejudiced opinions, they will simply deny its existence. 🤡

      Finally the description about the tree falling and the house trying to save itself, is an indication of the excessive use of automation is a fragile foundation for civilization, showing the story clearly goes beyond being only about the nuclear Armageddon in its meaning.

      • ZDL@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re putting an AI synopsis of a short story in a group literally called “Fuck AI”?!

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes because in this instance the AI is right.
          Go ahead and read Fahrenheit 451 and you will be able to see it very clearly.
          The tech society manipulated by media that very much look like AI is losing empathy and ability to think critically for themselves.
          The technology controls society not the people.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Second, you’re using a fucking slop machine in a group that is explicitly against the use of slop machines you utter buffoon!

              Not everything AI is slop, you are acting like a religious fanatic.
              I am totally against AI slop, but the existence of that although pretty overwhelming at times, does not mean everything AI is slop.
              But this sub is apparently religiously narrow minded.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              it’s EXPLICITLY a story about the threat of nuclear devastation.

              And how do you think that happened? This is written in 1950, with strong memories of Nazi Germany and the beginning of the cold war. Nuclear war is clearly also about human empathy, and how it might not save us from disaster. But my guess is that you never read Fahrenheit 451.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Rofl. As well as being tone deaf, that doesn’t actually capture what the story is about.

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well I’m not going to say your interpretation is wrong, if that fits what you think of the story that’s valid.

              • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                As a matter of opinion, is it a dogshit interpretation? Yes. Did reading it make me feel so sad and lonely that as a piece of art this crie de coeur that surely must ring in all our hearts at similar frequencies was reduced to a leaden summary by what sounds like a failing MBA student desperately trying to bump up their GPA with an elective they didn’t bother thinking about? Yes, too.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        So you read Bradbury and had an opinion, but still felt the need to ask a machine to validate your opinion? Don’t you see the irony of doing that while quoting “erosion of human agency and deep reading”?

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I made a google search to find a source, but the AI response reflected what I wanted to write, and I chose that as a source instead. And I was completely upfront about it.

          • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Still exactly my point. You could’ve searched your memories or read a source and formed an independent thought, instead of going for the ready-made no-thought option. To be clear, I don’t blame you personally, brains and life in general prefers to be efficient and not have to do work it doesn’t have to do, I’m just saying that it’s deeply ironical to post an AI overview about how AI erodes reading and thinking skills and then saying you agree with it. Do you believe Google and the current AI sphere are not adjacent entities to those that Bradbury and Orwell describe in their dystopian futures? The Google of today is not the same friendly page that helps you find cool stuff on the internet it used to be

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              it’s deeply ironical to post an AI overview about how AI erodes reading and thinking skills and then saying you agree with it.

              Yes I can appreciate that.

      • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s really not the feel I get from this short story. The house cooked food for the family to eat all together, they were shown to be playing in the yard when nuclear disaster occurred, they seemed to have regular bridge gatherings (from those outside the family I suspect), had reminders of birthdays/anniversaries of those outside the family, and had enrichment through poetry and the jungle/savanna scene in the nursery.

        These aren’t the marks of tech-slaves wasting away like in Wall-E. These were people that seemed to have been living an idealized life with lots of convenience. The house could have weeded the garden but the mother did it for pleasure. The kids could just have the house show them a stream of content but they played outside. The father could have just sat and smoked in the parlour but he had a social group.

        It’s a story about how even with a highly advanced life, it can be wiped out in an instant. This house persisted for probably years before a sudden fire decimated it in an hour. It’s telling us to cherish the things we have, not warning us that the things strip us of our humanity. Did they take these things for granted? Almost certainly. But it wasn’t a lack of empathy that killed the family.