• takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      It makes perfect sense since it is analog, each of them provides signal to a separate device. You had one screen and two speakers.

    • vic_rattlehead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know, I kinda like that it’s 1 cable per device. Definitely easier to troubleshoot audio if a cable is disconnected, versus trying to figure out why my TV isn’t passing HDMI 5.1 through the fiber audio output to a wireless transmitter to all the speakers! But maybe I’m old school too…

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          That (RCA component) was fucking stupid.

          Why 3 connectors when no consumer ever mixes color channels? (mixing between sources requires external sync, which is only on pro gear and an extra cable anyway)
          Why did they not decide between YPbPr and RGB before writing the standard?

          Should have just adopted SCART (European connector for bidirectional A/V, RGBA and kind of CEC), dammit

    • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      A pain in the arse to drive from modern video sources is what it is! Bought a CRT recently with a thought to using it as a cool secondary monitor but HDMI to composite adaptors are all crap!

      What I ended up doing was using HDMI to VGA, then VGA to composite. This let me set a proper 4:3 resolution and the picture improved a lot. What I should have done is not bother with composite at all and gone VGA to RGB to SCART as this would improve the colour a lot, but couldn’t find the adaptors for that. Not sure how widespread SCART was, might have only been a European thing but when I was a kid most TVs could either take a composite RCA input or SCART, and SCART could carry composite or RGB.

      Definitely given me the bug for old TVs though, I’m going to have to write an ActivityPub to Teletext software adaptor so I can have Lemmy on a ‘90s TV or something. HackTV looks like a lot of fun as well.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        “created” and “in mainstream use” are two different things… composite video has been around for a very long time, but composite video on consumer electronics really only started to get popular maybe starting in the late-80’s. I worked at a Radio Shack in the early 00’s and was still explaining to people how to use it because their old VCR only had coax and they used it on channel 3 or 4. The fact that “just match the colours” was so confusing to these people was … well… yeah.

  • darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I continue to be shocked to discover things that seemed very recent to me are now a decade or two old. I probably shouldn’t be, but here I am.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is that old? I still have devices using tulp. Modern day mixers and CDJ’s still use tulp connections, as do proper amps.

    I’m this old:

    • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      SCART was ahead of its time. You could control connected devices with it like HDMI CEC. You could wake up devices through it. You could daisy chain devices together with it. A TV could sent its TV signal down to a SCART connected device from its tuner! No equivalent for this exists today, unless there’s TV that do HDMI OUT! By the end, it could do 1080p!

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also, the TV didn’t just send the currently-tuned channel ‘down’ the chain, it also allowed connected devices to inject their own, synced, video back into the TV, so you could be watching a show on BBC1, say, and the VCR could overlay a box in the top-right corner letting you know it had started a scheduled recording off Channel 4. Or, if you used a device like a Selectavision, if you tuned into a scrambled channel the Selectavision would notice, decode it, and send the descrambled version back up to the TV, all without the user realising it. Those clever Frenchies.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Yes, SCART’s features are fucking clever but it got unwieldy thick because by the spec, each cable had to be separately shielded. Even the widescreen control signal that’s mostly DC. Why not use differential pairs to reduce thickness and cost, modulate the audio and control signals together for fewer wires, and add a 5V rail to accomodate little demodulating converters (if you want separate audio devices) and eventually power PVR/tuner dongles? Most people use TV speakers anyway, that’s the whole point of a single connector of an A/V standard. Not to mention how easily it fell out, almost every other connector holds better, and the ports are hard to feel on the back of the TV. If it’s a giant 32" one nearly flush against a wall, good luck lining it up whenever you yank a controller cord and the vibration makes it fall off! And while a small STB can hang off RCA jacks, SCART sometimes disconnects by the weight of the cable itself. Or it gets angled so the video passthrough stops working and you only find later your VCR recorded just audio.

          I think it’s because of these problems, the biggest one emerged: SCART never became a worldwide standard. Nowadays, TVs are made for a world market, so even North America finally enjoys PAL-compatible sets (while most Europe-market ones and many VCRs were 3-standard since 1990), but unfortunately SCART is basically gone, not to mention very few capture cards were made with real RGB input because RCA component is stupid (why 3 connectors when no consumer ever mixes color channels? (mixing requires external sync, which is only on pro equipment and an extra cable anyway) why not decide between YPbPr and RGB before writing the standard?)

          clever Frenchies

          Don’t say that. SCART is awesome despite its flaws but the same people also cursed half of Europe with fucking SECAM. Imagine needing a 64µs, 5MHz-bandwidth delay line just to decode color at all (unlike NTSC/PAL’s QAM, SECAM’s FM allows just a single chroma channel per line, alternatingly carrying U and V axes), and a frequency-modulation+pre-emphasis system in every console/camera/DVD player to encode it, plus no color killer option (disabling the colorburst) for sharp B/W like on the Apple II!

          In PAL, information between subsequent lines was used too but only to correct recovered carrier phase between colorbursts, which was optional (cheaper sets kept NTSC-style hue controls) and could be handled by a locked oscillator rather than a whole-ass delay line (before shift registers (digital sequential-access-memory), every color set had fucking piezo transducers and physical waves travelling through precisely cut quartz, WTF?!).

        • mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think some old double insulated devices have power supply issues that meant that the ground/plug-shell would be energized at half mains voltage. You wouldn’t notice since the rest of the TV was wood/plastic, not metal, but if you touched the metal on the back you would get shocked.

        • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It probably had a good reason to shock you! /s.
          By design, SCART carries low voltage, not enough to shock someone. The device it was connected to could have been faulty or badly grounded and leaked higher voltage into the connector though. So its plausible.

    • tresspass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m gen z but just set up tvheadend after unsubscribing from any remaining streaming services. Learning there is free tv over the air was a shock to me

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      TVs had channels?

      I’m old enough to remember Saturday morning cartoons, but seriously, it feels like TVs don’t really have channels anymore, and instead just have thousands of shitty streaming apps.

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s been about 20 years since I watched cable/broadcast TV in my home. But yeah way back tvs didn’t have inputs for other devices, instead you had a box which you put in between the antenna or cable signal and your device which basically over wrote channel 3(why channel 3? I have no idea) with whatever your device was out putting. So if you wanted to play Nintendo you would change to channel 3 and see Mario or metroid.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s been a while since I’ve had to do a game system setup on an old TV, (like damn near 20 years) but I think you used channel 3 because it was a channel reserved for local communications, so there would never be “TV” on that channel. Your VCR connected to the TV with a coax cable, and if you wanted to have “TV” plugged in at the same time, you either needed a TV with multiple coax inputs (I think it was common to have 2, one for VCR, and one for satellite/aerial antenna) or a coax splitter. Early on, those RCA plugs weren’t built into a lot of TVs, so you needed the VCR to inject that signal onto coax for the TV. Lots (if not most/all) VCRs would let you switch the channel used in the settings, I think mainly to cover other regions where channel 3 was not standardized.

          • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            A local news station use(d? they are all digital now) channel 3, with both ota and cable. I remember using both 3 and (front) rca ‘input’ for my games.

          • vrek@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I remember the coax cable but did not know about channel 3 being local communication. I thought it was just convention.

            Thanks for teaching me.

            • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s not the case. We had WISC-TV, the CBS affiliate, on channel 3 in our area. I seem to recall that one could switch between channel 2 and channel 3 on the Atari RF modulators, and later, VCRs could switch between channel 3 and channel 4. I think they used 2 and 3 because those were the first two channels, and the FCC wouldn’t allow two adjacent channels in the same area, so one of the two would always be unused for everybody. (Oddly, there was no TV channel 1.)

              • vrek@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I had a nes and that switched between 3 to 4. My next console was n64 which had the 3 wires you see in the original post

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I could be wrong, but I think that was what the convention was in the US at least.

              Similar to how there is nothing “stopping” a web server from having a 192.168.x.x address, but we have a standard that blocks off those addresses to be used inside of your own network.

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Really? Interesting. We’re there other places or other channels like that? Like if you were in England or India did they do channel 3, channel 4, or something totally different?

        • Medic8me@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Canada was either channel 3 or 4 depending on the device. Probably all American made then.

      • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Was there a station that broadcast on channel 3? I remember TVs growing up often (always?) having support for both channels 3 and 4 as auxiliary inputs. Also, what happened to channels 1 and 2?

          • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ah, ok. I’m misremembering. It’s only channel one that didn’t exist. Just looked it up and apparently the FCC reallocated it in 1948 because it was causing interference with another use.

            • watson@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              If I’m remembering right, channel 3 was all local ads when I was a kid. I think the only times I ever watched it were when I shut off whatever was using channel 3 and left the tv on.